Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995734›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using transfer learning with multi-modal 3D Inception-v4.

Zengbei Yuan, Na Qi, Zirong Zhou, Jie Ding, Xing Chen, Junhao Wu, Jie Wang, Jun Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zengbei Yuan *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Na Qi *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zirong Zhou *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jie DingDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xing ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junhao WuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Positron Emission Tomography Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Positron Emission Tomography Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jun ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep learning (DL) technologies are playing increasingly important roles in computer-aided diagnosis in medicine. In this study, we sought to address issues related to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on multi-modal features, and introduced a multi-modal three-dimensional Inception-v4 model that employs transfer learning for AD diagnosis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical score data. Methods: The multi-modal three-dimensional (3D) Inception-v4 model was first pre-trained using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Subsequently, independent validation data were used to fine-tune the model with pre-trained weight parameters. The model was quantitatively evaluated using the mean values obtained from five-fold cross-validation. Further, control experiments were conducted to verify the performance of the model patients with AD, and in the study of disease progression. Results: In the AD diagnosis task, when a single image marker was used, the average accuracy (ACC) and area under the curve (AUC) were 62.21% and 71.87%, respectively. When transfer learning was not employed, the average ACC and AUC were 75.74% and 83.13%, respectively. Conversely, the combined approach proposed in this study achieved an average ACC of 87.84%, and an average AUC of 90.80% [with an average precision (PRE) of 87.21%, an average recall (REC) of 82.52%, and an average F1 of 83.58%]. Conclusions: In comparison with existing methods, the performance of the proposed method was superior in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Specifically, the method showed an enhanced ability to accurately distinguish among various stages of AD. Our findings show that multi-modal feature fusion and transfer learning can be valuable resources in the treatment of patients with AD, and in the study of disease progression.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s disease (AD)deep learning (DL)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)mini-mental state examination (MMSE)

Identifiers

PMID39995734
PMCPMC11847174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.