ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using transfer learning with multi-modal 3D Inception-v4.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Based on Multi-Modal Domain Adaptation.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Deep learning (DL) technologies are playing increasingly important roles in computer-aided diagnosis in medicine. In this study, we sought to address issues related to the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on multi-modal features, and introduced a multi-modal three-dimensional Inception-v4 model that employs transfer learning for AD diagnosis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical score data. Methods: The multi-modal three-dimensional (3D) Inception-v4 model was first pre-trained using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Subsequently, independent validation data were used to fine-tune the model with pre-trained weight parameters. The model was quantitatively evaluated using the mean values obtained from five-fold cross-validation. Further, control experiments were conducted to verify the performance of the model patients with AD, and in the study of disease progression. Results: In the AD diagnosis task, when a single image marker was used, the average accuracy (ACC) and area under the curve (AUC) were 62.21% and 71.87%, respectively. When transfer learning was not employed, the average ACC and AUC were 75.74% and 83.13%, respectively. Conversely, the combined approach proposed in this study achieved an average ACC of 87.84%, and an average AUC of 90.80% [with an average precision (PRE) of 87.21%, an average recall (REC) of 82.52%, and an average F1 of 83.58%]. Conclusions: In comparison with existing methods, the performance of the proposed method was superior in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Specifically, the method showed an enhanced ability to accurately distinguish among various stages of AD. Our findings show that multi-modal feature fusion and transfer learning can be valuable resources in the treatment of patients with AD, and in the study of disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.