ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Magnetic resonance imaging-based bone and muscle quality parameters for predicting clinical subsequent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebral augmentation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging-derived vertebral bone quality correlates with computed tomography-derived bone density and paraspinal muscle degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a CT-based predictive model for new vertebral compression fractures: the role of vertebral CT attenuation and paraspinal muscle.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical subsequent vertebral fracture (SVF) is a common complication following percutaneous vertebral augmentation treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, cross-sectional area (CSA), and degree of fat infiltration (DFI) of paravertebral muscles are effective predictors of spinal surgery-related complications. However, the relationship between these parameters and SVF remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of these MRI-based bone and muscle quality parameters for predicting SVF after percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture treated with percutaneous vertebral augmentation at Xuzhou Central Hospital between January 2017 and December 2020. Clinical SVF was diagnosed if there was new episode of back pain and a confirmed acute fracture on MRI. Noncontrast T1-weighted MRI and axial T2-weighted MRI were used to determine the VBQ score and measure CSA and DFI, respectively. A multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors was performed to determine the correlation between VBQ score, DFI, CSA, and SVF. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the predictive ability of SVF. The DeLong test was used to compare the predictive ability. Pearson correlation analysis was used to characterize the relationships between VBQ score and both CSA and DFI. Results: A total of 289 patients were included in this study, and 41 (14.2%) patients developed SVF. Compared with the non-SVF group, the SVF group had a higher VBQ score (3.83 Conclusions: The VBQ score and DFI were independent predictors for clinical SVF after percutaneous vertebral augmentation. The combination of VBQ score and DFI significantly improved the predictive accuracy. Moreover, there was a significant positive correlation between the VBQ score and DFI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.