ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Spinal sagittal and coronal morphology characteristics in children with short stature.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Normative values of the sagittal lumbopelvic alignment in children during the first decade of life : A retrospective observational study from a German paediatric orthopaedic hospital.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The characteristics of total sagittal and coronal plane parameters in children with short stature (SS) and the correlations between these parameters are currently unknown. This case-control study sought to retrospectively investigate the characteristics of total sagittal and coronal plane parameters in children with SS and examine the correlations between these parameters. Methods: The data of children aged 3-15 years with SS and normal heights were collected, and the children were allocated to the observation and control groups, respectively. The following parameters were analyzed: coronal Cobb angle, cervical lordosis (CL) angle, T1 slope (T1S), thoracic kyphosis (TK) angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, sacral inclination angle, pelvic inclination angle, pelvic incidence angle, cervical sagittal axis, spinal sagittal axis, trunk pelvic angle (TPA), and spino-sacral angle (SSA). Results: In total, 41 children with SS were enrolled in this study, and 80 age- and sex-matched children with normal heights were included as the controls. The CL angle, T1S, and TPA were significantly greater (P<0.050) in the children with SS than those with normal heights. The children with SS were further divided into group A with CL (a positive CL angle) and group B without CL (a negative CL angle), while the children with normal heights were further divided into group A' with CL and group B' without CL. The CL angle, T1S, and TK angle were significantly greater (P<0.05), but the Cobb angle and spinal sagittal axis were significantly smaller (P<0.05) in group A than group B, while the CL angle, T1S, and TK angle were significantly greater (P<0.05) in group A than group A'. The Cobb angle was significantly smaller (P=0.024), and the spinal sagittal axis and TPA were significantly greater (P=0.013 and 0.005, respectively) in group B than group B'. Different correlations were found among the spinal parameters. Conclusions: SS children have a significantly larger CL angle, T1S, TPA, and TK angle, and a tendency toward a hunchback posture. When scoliosis occurs in the coronal plane in children with SS, the degree of scoliosis is relatively small, and the spine tilts toward the dorsal side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.