Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995707›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025

Prognosis prediction in type B aortic intramural hematoma patients using a combined model based on aortic computed tomography angiography radiomics.

Delong Gao, Tong Li, Matheus G Carelli, Lukasz Szarpak, Yueying Pan, Hanxiong Guan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Delong GaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tong LiUnited Imaging Medical Technology Co., LTD., Shanghai, China.
Matheus G CarelliDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Lukasz SzarpakDepartment of Clinical Research and Development, LUXMED Group, Warsaw, Poland.
Yueying Pan *Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hanxiong Guan *Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9675-4496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The course of patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is unstable, and different studies have shown that the evolution of this type of IMH is highly heterogeneous. This study sought to explore the value of radiomics in predicting the prognosis of type B aortic IMH, and to develop and validate a prediction model of type B aortic IMH progression. Methods: A total of 119 patients with type B aortic IMH who had not undergone surgical or thoracic endovascular aortic repair treatment were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into the progressive group (n=61) and stable group (n=58) based on re-examination aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging. The patients were then randomly divided into the training cohort (n=95) and the validation cohort (n=24). The uAI Research Portal (URP) was used to perform the radiomics feature extraction of the intensity, shape, texture, and gradient features. Next, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression (LR) method was used for feature selection, and prediction models were constructed based on clinical features, CTA imaging features, and radiomic features. Different machine-learning algorithms were used to build the models, including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), LR, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree, and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score were used to evaluate the efficacy of the prediction models. Results: After the application of the LASSO method, 12 radiomic features were selected from an initial pool of 1,004 radiomic features, 12 features were selected from the 21 clinical features, and 11 features were selected from the 15 CTA imaging features. Five predictive models were then constructed using distinct combinations of feature sets. For the test set, the AUC of the SVM algorithm in the radiomics model was the highest (0.833), that of the KNN algorithm in the clinical model was the highest (0.701), that of the RF algorithm in the CTA imaging model was the highest (0.806), and those of the LR and SGD algorithms in the clinical + CTA imaging model were the highest (both 0.792). The combined radiomics + clinical + CTA model had the highest AUC value (0.917), which was higher than that of the single radiomics model (0.833), CTA model (0.806), clinical + CTA model (0.792), and clinical model (0.701). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision and F1 scores of the combined radiomics + clinical + CTA model were all >0.75. Conclusions: The comprehensive model that incorporated clinical, CTA imaging, and radiomic features performed the best and accurately predicted the progression of type B aortic IMH. This model could help clinicians make optimal treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Aortic intramural hematoma (IMH)prognosisradiomicstype B aortic IMH

Identifiers

PMID39995707
PMCPMC11847199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.