ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2025
Prognosis prediction in type B aortic intramural hematoma patients using a combined model based on aortic computed tomography angiography radiomics.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of a non-contrast CT-based radiomics model in patients with Type-B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of initial hematoma area in patients with acute type B aortic intramural hematoma.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Radiomics-Based Machine Learning in the Diagnosis of Type-B Aortic Dissection on Computed Tomography Images.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The course of patients with type B aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) is unstable, and different studies have shown that the evolution of this type of IMH is highly heterogeneous. This study sought to explore the value of radiomics in predicting the prognosis of type B aortic IMH, and to develop and validate a prediction model of type B aortic IMH progression. Methods: A total of 119 patients with type B aortic IMH who had not undergone surgical or thoracic endovascular aortic repair treatment were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into the progressive group (n=61) and stable group (n=58) based on re-examination aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging. The patients were then randomly divided into the training cohort (n=95) and the validation cohort (n=24). The uAI Research Portal (URP) was used to perform the radiomics feature extraction of the intensity, shape, texture, and gradient features. Next, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression (LR) method was used for feature selection, and prediction models were constructed based on clinical features, CTA imaging features, and radiomic features. Different machine-learning algorithms were used to build the models, including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), LR, K-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree, and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score were used to evaluate the efficacy of the prediction models. Results: After the application of the LASSO method, 12 radiomic features were selected from an initial pool of 1,004 radiomic features, 12 features were selected from the 21 clinical features, and 11 features were selected from the 15 CTA imaging features. Five predictive models were then constructed using distinct combinations of feature sets. For the test set, the AUC of the SVM algorithm in the radiomics model was the highest (0.833), that of the KNN algorithm in the clinical model was the highest (0.701), that of the RF algorithm in the CTA imaging model was the highest (0.806), and those of the LR and SGD algorithms in the clinical + CTA imaging model were the highest (both 0.792). The combined radiomics + clinical + CTA model had the highest AUC value (0.917), which was higher than that of the single radiomics model (0.833), CTA model (0.806), clinical + CTA model (0.792), and clinical model (0.701). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision and F1 scores of the combined radiomics + clinical + CTA model were all >0.75. Conclusions: The comprehensive model that incorporated clinical, CTA imaging, and radiomic features performed the best and accurately predicted the progression of type B aortic IMH. This model could help clinicians make optimal treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.