Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995683›Full record

ArticleZoological journal of the Linnean Society2025

Divergent patterns of cranial suture fusion in marsupial and placental mammals.

Heather E White, Abigail S Tucker, Anjali Goswami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological journal of the Linnean Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heather E WhiteCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Abigail S TuckerCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8871-6094
Anjali GoswamiScience Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9465-810X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranial sutures, both open and closed, support a myriad of skull functions, including redistributing strain, accommodating brain expansion, supporting cranial bone growth, and protecting the brain. Thus, variation in the degree, timing, and pattern of suture fusion has functional implications. Using a comparative ontogenetic framework across Mammalia, we quantified degree and pattern of suture fusion through ontogeny for 22 mammalian species (

Indexed as

fusionKrogmanmammalmarsupialsuture

Identifiers

PMID39995683
PMCPMC7617424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.