ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Six events that shaped antibody approvals in oncology.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fc-engineering for improved cancer immunotherapy.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- A PBD dimer-containing antibody-drug conjugate targeting CCRL2 for high-risk MDS/AML including TP53-mutated disease.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Clinical Pharmacology and Translational Science Considerations in the Development of Dual-Payload Antibody Drug Conjugates.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- TRBC2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of T cell cancers.Nature cancer · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Biotech Drug Discovery and Product Development.MedComm · 2025Review
- Microenvironment and Tumor Heterogeneity as Pharmacological Targets in Precision Oncology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Single-Agent and Associated Therapies with Monoclonal Antibodies: What About Follicular Lymphoma?Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A little over twenty-five years ago, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the chimeric antibody rituximab which fundamentally altered the landscape of anti-cancer drugs. While only a few antibodies were approved in the immediate years that followed the rituximab approval, the last decade saw a wave of antibody-drug approvals in the oncology arena. In the last three years, the EMA and FDA greenlighted eighteen antibodies, the majority of them designed in the formats of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and bispecific antibodies (BsAb). While the use of ADC and BsAb formats and the current rapid pace of approvals appear routine and almost inevitable, such progress was thought to be quite improbable in the early days of therapeutic antibody development. To understand how we arrived at the current state of antibody development in oncology, we focus on six monumental events that shaped antibody approvals over the last two and half decades. We examine the circumstances that led to the approval of rituximab and trastuzumab, the first successful antibodies for the treatment of hematologic and solid cancers. We detail the generation of the ADC and BsAb formats that dramatically augmented antibody-mediated precision cytotoxicity. Finally, we explore the development of ipilimumab, the first immune checkpoint-inhibiting antibody that activates the immune system to kill cancer cells, and the discovery that allowed the use of checkpoint inhibitors across all cancer types based on the presence of genetic markers. Revisiting these key events provides critical insights into the process of antibody development in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.