ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
Development of quality indicators for hand osteoarthritis care - Results from an European consensus study.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current and future advances in practice: practical management of hand osteoarthritis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People with hand osteoarthritis (OA) often have poor access to recommended treatments. To enhance care quality, quality indicators (QIs) based on clinical recommendations are essential. Current QI sets, like the Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator Questionnaire (OA-QI v.2), primarily address hip- and knee OA, and not hand OA. Objectives: To adapt the OA-QI v.2 for assessing patient-reported quality of hand OA care. Design: We used the OA-QI v.2. set as a starting point and adapted it to reflect hand OA care. A literature search was performed to identify potential QIs for hand OA following the Rand/UCLA Appropriateness method. A European expert panel, comprising researchers, clinicians, and patient research partners, participated in online meetings to discuss adaptation and suggest new QIs based on treatment recommendations for hand OA, and anonymously rated each suggested QI regarding its importance, validity, usefulness, and feasibility. Consensus was defined by predefined rating cut-off scores. The adapted questionnaire was translated from English into Norwegian. Cognitive debriefing interviews with Norwegian and UK hand OA patients were conducted to ensure clarity. Results: Our initial literature search provided 1670 articles, with none describing relevant QIs. After three voting rounds, sixteen QI items reached consensus, reflecting current hand OA care standards. Items were generally well understood, requiring only minor clarity amendments after patient interviews (N = 28). Conclusion: The OA-QI v.2 was successfully adapted into a 16-item Hand OA-QI set ensuring alignment with international care standards for hand OA through literature review, international expert panels and patient feedback on language and layout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.