ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
A systematic review of posterior pilon fractures.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The role and regulatory mechanism of miR-122-5p in the process of pilon fracture healing.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior pilon fractures (PPFs) are intra-articular ankle injuries of the posterior aspect of the distal tibia, often caused by high-energy mechanisms of trauma such as falling from high heights or motor vehicular accidents. However, the definition, mechanism, classification, and surgical approach for fractures have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to explore current literature to expand the understanding of this fracture to help physicians achieve better treatment outcomes. Keywords such as "posterior pilon," "surgical approach," "fracture," etc., were used to find relevant literature on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science. Inclusion criteria involved studies discussing PPFs and retrospective and prospective cohort studies. Exclusion criteria included non-English-published papers, anatomical or biomechanical studies, and studies not discussing PPFs. General demographics, complications, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) functional outcome scores were collected. A total of 18 publications were selected for data collection, most of which were retrospective studies. The articles discussed 959 (Male: 430, Female: 529) patients. PPFs are defined as distal tibia fractures involving impaction of the articular surface and proximal displacement of talus and posterior malleolus fragments. This characteristic fracture is caused by high-energy rotational and axial load. Five studies in this review describe a classification system for ankle fractures that include studies from Klammer (2013), Bartoníček (2015), Mason (2017), Zhang (2018), and Wang (2020). The posterolateral (PL) approach was used in 34.9 % of cases, followed by the posteromedial (PM) in 7.9 %, modified PM in 20.7 %, and combined PM and PL approach in 6.9 % of cases. PPFs are breaks that occur in the posterior half of the articular surface of the distal tibia, typically affecting the weight-bearing area. These fractures result from a combination of rotational and axial loads, leading to intra-articular ankle fractures that often involve a sizeable posterior fragment. Five classification systems for PPFs identify characteristics observable in X-rays, CT scans, or through morphological analysis. The posterolateral (PL) approach was used more than the posteromedial approach. Common complications included malreduction, nerve injuries, and post-operative pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.