ArticleDEN open2025
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic cystogastrostomy in very young children (aged <5 years): Feasibility, success, and safety.
Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Post-ERCP adverse events in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of post-ERCP pancreatitis incidence with synthesis of risk factors and prevention strategies.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- The application of gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Paucity of data and concerns about potential lower effectiveness and more adverse events limit the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic cystogastrostomy in younger children even in high-volume centers. We retrospectively analyzed indications, success rates, and adverse events of all the children (<18 years) who underwent ERCP and endoscopic cystogastrostomy between January 2010 to May 2024 at our center. Methods: Data, including patient demographics, indications for the procedure, technical details, and adverse events, were collected from our prospectively kept database and compared according to age groups (<1 year, 1-5 years, 5-10 years, and 10-18 years). Results: A total of 286 ERCP (273 therapeutic and 13 diagnostic) and 57 endoscopic cystogastrostomy were performed in 222 (138 boys) and 55 children (32 boys), respectively, during the study period with 20% ERCP procedures in under-five children. In children <5 years, the majority of the ERCPs were for biliary diseases (87%), while pancreatic duct procedures (39.5%) were done in higher numbers in children >5 years. For biliary ERCP, choledochal cyst (15, 33%) was the most common etiology in under-five children and choledocholithiasis (60, 34%) in children >5 years. Cannulation and technical success rates were 95% and 92%, respectively with no significant difference across age groups. Adverse events were noted in 36 (16%) with post-ERCP pancreatitis (8%) being the most common. All adverse events were managed conservatively with no mortality. Conclusion: ERCP can safely be performed in all children, including those under five with various hepato-pancreato-biliary diseases with high technical success rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.