ArticleAnaesthesia2025
A qualitative exploration of stressors in anaesthesia training in the UK and mechanisms to improve resident wellbeing.
Article in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHigh levels of stress and burnout have been identified among resident anaesthetists in UK training programmes. Factors involving clinical roles, workplace culture and training are known stressors, but in-depth research investigating how to improve wellbeing is limited.
methodsWe used a qualitative design in two phases with participants from across the UK. Phase 1 involved semi-structured interviews of resident anaesthetists in the 2nd-5th years of training, and educational stakeholders. Phase 2 involved additional participants in two focus groups, one each for residents and stakeholders. Interviews and focus groups were conducted online, audio-recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis using a framework approach.
resultsWe interviewed 52 participants in phase 1, comprising resident anaesthetists from England, Wales and Scotland and key educational stakeholders. A further 11 resident anaesthetists and stakeholders participated in the phase 2 focus groups. We identified four overarching themes contributing to stress: clinical work; non-clinical work; structure of training; and workplace culture. We also identified supportive features at individual, local, regional and national levels. Stress and burnout were commonplace, particularly during demanding periods of training. Balancing non-clinical commitments alongside busy workloads was difficult. Clinically, intensive care medicine and obstetrics generated the most stress. Frequent rotations and long commutes increased stress, impacting on working and family relationships. Curriculum changes, examinations and competition for higher training posts caused stress and poor morale. Proposed mechanisms to improve wellbeing include: peer-to-peer support; request-based rotas; adoption of 'lead employers'; decreasing rotation frequency and commuting distances; access to less than full-time working and professional support; and adapting the structure of training to improve the stability of the resident anaesthetist workforce. DISCUSSION: Attention to the factors identified as contributing to stress could improve resident anaesthetists' wellbeing through changes to policy and practice at local, regional and national levels, for which we make research-informed recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.