ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Genomics-Enabled Mixed-Stock Analysis Uncovers Intraspecific Migratory Complexity and Detects Unsampled Populations in a Harvested Fish.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contributions of distinct populations to annual harvests provide key insights to conservation, especially in migratory species that return to specific reproductive areas. In this context, genetic stock identification (GSI) requires reference samples from source populations to assign harvested individuals, yet sampling might be challenging as reproductive areas could be remote and/or unknown. To investigate intraspecific variation in walleye (Sander vitreus) populations harvested in two large lakes in northern Quebec, we used genotyping-by-sequencing data to develop a panel of 303 filtered single-nucleotide polymorphisms. We then genotyped 1465 fish and assessed individual migration distances from GPS coordinates of capture locations. Samples were assigned to a source population using two methods, one requiring allele frequencies of known populations (RUBIAS) and the other without prior knowledge (STRUCTURE). Individual assignments to a known population reached 93% consistency between both methods in the main lake where we identified all five major source populations. However, the analyses also revealed up to three small unsampled populations. Furthermore, populations were characterised by large differences in average migration distance. In contrast, assignment consistency reached 99% in the neighbouring lake and walleye were assigned with high confidence to two populations having a similar distribution throughout the lake. The complex population structure and migration patterns in the main lake suggest a more heterogeneous habitat and thus, greater potential for local adaptation. This study highlights how combining analytical approaches can inform the robustness of GSI results in a given system and detect intraspecific diversity and complexity relevant for conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.