Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995293›Full record

ArticleNutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia2025

Choice on the menu in residential aged care: An underrated tool for maintaining resident autonomy.

Mikaela Wheeler, Karen L Abbey, Sandra M Capra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Choice on the menu in residential aged care: An underrated tool for maintaining resident autonomy.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mikaela WheelerFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Karen L AbbeyFaculty of Health and Behavioural Science, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Sandra M CapraFaculty of Health and Behavioural Science, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Science, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Funding

Andrews Meats Pty LimitedAustralian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis qualitative study aimed to explore residents' experiences of autonomy in relation to their meals pre and post-intervention, which implemented a restaurant-style dining service and increased the number of meal choices available in one residential aged care home.

methodsParticipants completed semi-structured interviews pre- and post-intervention. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Adopting an interpretivist approach, the researchers prioritised participants' subjective experiences and engaged collaboratively in reflexive practices to examine their positionality while developing themes.

resultsTwenty participants completed pre-interviews and eighteen completed post-interviews. Themes developed from pre-intervention interviews included 'Autonomy in residential aged care homes: Ideal versus reality', 'Values and expectations of residential aged care' and 'Disempowerment within residential aged care systems'. Themes from post intervention interviews included 'Reclaiming Autonomy' 'System design to support autonomy and Autonomy beyond meal choice'.

conclusionResidents in residential aged care encounter institutional factors that undermine their sense of autonomy. However, foodservice systems have the potential to enhance choice and autonomy and positively impact residents.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFood PreferencesFood ServicesHomes for the AgedPersonal AutonomyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMealsNursing HomesQualitative ResearchRestaurantsaged careautonomyfoodservicelong term careolder adultsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39995293
PMCPMC12168056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.