ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2025
Clinical value of amylase and its prognostic accuracy in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus).
Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo retrospectively evaluate plasma amylase concentrations in client-owned guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) and determine a possible association with mortality. MATERIALS AND
methodsMedical records of guinea pigs that had a biochemistry panel from four institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Guinea pigs were excluded from the study if plasma amylase concentrations were not measured or there was no follow-up 30 days after the initial biochemistry panel.
resultsTwo hundred seventy-eight guinea pigs were included. Odds of mortality were not linearly associated with increasing amylase concentrations, but higher mortality was seen with markedly elevated plasma amylase (1910 to 3985 U/L; 65.2% death). After multivariable adjustment, guinea pigs with markedly elevated plasma amylase concentrations were seven times more likely to die within 30 days compared to those with a concentration within the reference interval (1339 to 1573 U/L) (aOR: 7.98; adj. 95% CI: 3.29 to 19.35). In addition, BUN concentration higher than 62 mg/dL had a 29.97 times greater odds of 30-day mortality than those with a BUN concentration lower than 62 mg/dL (aOR: 29.97, adj. 95% CI: 3.78 to 237.65). The AUC of the ROC curve of amylase concentrations to predict 30-day mortality was 72.7% (95% CI: 65% to 79.9%). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While the exact pathophysiology of changes in plasma amylase concentrations in guinea pigs is unknown, this enzyme has clinical significance, considering that markedly elevated plasma amylase concentrations were associated with a higher risk of mortality. The actual prognostic capacity of the enzyme alone is limited and should be evaluated as part of a full clinical picture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.