ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Techniques for Pilonidal Sinus: A Turkish Retrospective Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open Pilonidal Excision as a Translational Human Model for Wound Healing and Skin Regeneration Research.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Kiss Y flap: a novel low-tension reconstruction technique after excision of pilonidal sinus.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pilonidal sinus is a chronic or acute infectious disease in the intergluteal cleft. Various surgical treatments exist, but optimal management remains debated. This study compares outcomes of primary midline closure (PMC), Karydakis flap (KF), Limberg flap (LF), and laser pilonidotomy (LP) in adult patients with pilonidal sinus disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of 476 patients who underwent surgery for pilonidal sinus disease in our clinic between January 2011 and September 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. After 54 patients were excluded, the remaining patients were divided into 4 groups: PMC (n=228), LF (n=82), KF (n=53), and LP (n=59). Patient characteristics, surgical findings, and quality of life outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS The operation time was significantly shorter in the LP group (P<0.001). Seroma (P=0.006), wound dehiscence (P<0.001), and postoperative recurrence (P=0.017) rates were significantly higher in the PMC group. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LP group (mean, 8 h; P<0.001). Pain-free toilet sitting time, pain-free walking time, and return to work time were statistically significantly shorter in the LP group (all P<0.001). According to the Likert scale, the satisfaction rate of the LP group was significantly higher (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The PMC method has a higher postoperative complication rate and a slower return to normal physical activity. The KF method appears to be more advantageous in terms of postoperative recurrence rate. Although the LP method seems to be more advantageous in terms of quality of life in selected patients, studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.