Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995184›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2025

MEDUSA for Identifying Death Regulatory Genes in Chemo-genetic Profiling Data.

Megan E Honeywell, Michael J Lee

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan E HoneywellDepartment of Systems Biology, UMass Chan Medical School.
Michael J LeeDepartment of Systems Biology, UMass Chan Medical School; michael.lee@umassmed.edu.

Funding

Personalization and Failure Testing of Dual Switch Gene Drives in Lung CancerU01CA265709 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI PRITCHARD, JUSTIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Systems and Network-level Regulation of Cell DeathR35GM152194 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Michael Jungho Lee · 2024 to 2026
$1.3M
Characterization of drug mechanisms of lethality in vivoR21CA294000 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LEE, MICHAEL JUNGHO · 2024 to 2024
$431k
Activation of non-apoptotic cell death by the DNA damage responseF31CA268847 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI HONEYWELL, MEGAN ELIZABETH · 2022 to 2023
$64k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA268847NCI NIH HHS R21 CA294000NCI NIH HHS U01 CA265709NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systematic screening of gain- or loss-of-function genetic perturbations can be used to characterize the genetic dependencies and mechanisms of regulation for essentially any cellular process of interest. These experiments typically involve profiling from a pool of single gene perturbations and how each genetic perturbation affects the relative cell fitness. When applied in the context of drug efficacy studies, often called chemo-genetic profiling, these methods should be effective at identifying drug mechanisms of action. Unfortunately, fitness-based chemo-genetic profiling studies are ineffective at identifying all components of a drug response. For instance, these studies generally fail to identify which genes regulate drug-induced cell death. Several issues contribute to obscuring death regulation in fitness-based screens, including the confounding effects of proliferation rate variation, variation in the drug-induced coordination between growth and death, and, in some cases, the inability to separate DNA from live and dead cells. MEDUSA is an analytical method for identifying death-regulatory genes in conventional chemo-genetic profiling data. It works by using computational simulations to estimate the growth and death rates that created an observed fitness profile rather than scoring fitness itself. Effective use of the method depends on optimal tittering of experimental conditions, including the drug dose, starting population size, and length of the assay. This manuscript will describe how to set up a chemo-genetic profiling study for MEDUSA-based analysis, and we will demonstrate how to use the method to quantify death rates in chemo-genetic profiling data.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSoftwareCell DeathHumans

Identifiers

PMID39995184
PMCPMC12184521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.