Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995125›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2025

ISR Modulators in Neurological Diseases.

Alexander Pavlovich Kalinin, Ekaterina Sergeevna Zubkova, Mikhail Yuryevich Menshikov, Yelena Victorovna Parfyonova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distinct cell type-specific mechanisms underlie cognitive dysfunction during persistent integrated stress response activation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander Pavlovich KalininNational Medical Research Centre of Cardiology Named after Academician E.I. Chazov, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 121552, Russia.
Ekaterina Sergeevna ZubkovaNational Medical Research Centre of Cardiology Named after Academician E.I. Chazov, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 121552, Russia.
Mikhail Yuryevich MenshikovNational Medical Research Centre of Cardiology Named after Academician E.I. Chazov, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 121552, Russia.
Yelena Victorovna ParfyonovaNational Medical Research Centre of Cardiology Named after Academician E.I. Chazov, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow 121552, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation, RSF 23-15-00539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dysfunction of different cells lies in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases and is usually associated with cellular stress. Various stressors trigger the integrated stress response (ISR) signaling, whose highly conserved mechanism is primarily aimed at protecting a stress-exposed cell to cope as safely as possible with such stressful conditions. On the contrary, if a cell is unable to cope with excessive stress, the ISR can induce apoptosis. The ISR mechanism, whose main stage is the inhibition of translation machinery in favor of the synthesis of specific proteins, including the transcription factors ATF3, ATF4, CEBPA, and CEBPB, which function only as dimers and determine the uniqueness of the ISR response in each individual case, thus ensures different outcomes of the ISR. Inhibition of global protein synthesis is achieved through phosphorylation of eIF2α by PERK, HRI, PKR, or GCN2. To date, a number of compounds have been developed that modulate the ISR, including activators and inhibitors of the abovementioned ISR kinases as well as modulators of p-eIF2α dephosphorylation. They target different ISR stages, allowing a broad ISR modulation strategy. At the same time, there are no drugs that are both exceptionally safe and effective for the treatment of several neurological diseases, so there is an urgent need for new approaches to the treatment of these disorders. In this review, we represent ISR signaling as an important participant in the pathogenesis of neurological diseases. We also describe how various ISR modulators may become a part of future therapies for these diseases.

Indexed as

Nervous System DiseasesSignal TransductionStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsHumansAlzheimer's diseaseamyotrophic lateral sclerosisATF4eIF2Integrated stress responseParkinson's diseasepriontraumatic brain injury.

Identifiers

PMID39995125
PMCPMC12308010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.