Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995109›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Repairing Misperceptions of Words Early in a Sentence is More Effortful Than Repairing Later Words, Especially for Listeners With Cochlear Implants.

Michael L Smith, Matthew B Winn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael L SmithDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0223-376X
Matthew B WinnDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4237-7872

Funding

Listening effort in cochlear implant usersR01DC017114 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Matthew Brandon Winn · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
The impact of extra effort and accumulated fatigue in listeners who wear a cochlear implantF32DC021076 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SMITH, MICHAEL L · 2023 to 2024
$150k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC021076NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of repairing misperceptions has been identified as a contributor to effortful listening in people who use cochlear implants (CIs). The current study was designed to examine the relative cost of repairing misperceptions at earlier or later parts of a sentence that contained contextual information that could be used to infer words both predictively and retroactively. Misperceptions were enforced at specific times by replacing single words with noise. Changes in pupil dilation were analyzed to track differences in the timing and duration of effort, comparing listeners with typical hearing (TH) or with CIs. Increases in pupil dilation were time-locked to the moment of the missing word, with longer-lasting increases when the missing word was earlier in the sentence. Compared to listeners with TH, CI listeners showed elevated pupil dilation for longer periods of time after listening, suggesting a lingering effect of effort after sentence offset. When needing to mentally repair missing words, CI listeners also made more mistakes on words elsewhere in the sentence, even though these words were not masked. Changes in effort based on the position of the missing word were not evident in basic measures like peak pupil dilation and only emerged when the full-time course was analyzed, suggesting the timing analysis adds new information to our understanding of listening effort. These results demonstrate that some mistakes are more costly than others and incur different levels of mental effort to resolve the mistake, underscoring the information lost when characterizing speech perception with simple measures like percent-correct scores.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoisePerceptual MaskingPupilTime FactorsYoung Adultcochlear implantslistening effortperceptual restorationpupillometryspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID39995109
PMCPMC11851752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.