Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39995017›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025

Cost thresholds for anticipated long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis products in Eastern and Southern Africa: a mathematical modelling study.

David Kaftan, Monisha Sharma, Danielle Resar, Masabho Milali, Edinah Mudimu, Linxuan Wu, Cory Arrouzet, Ingrida Platais, Hae-Young Kim, Sarah Jenkins and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Lenacapavir as pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David KaftanDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, 10016, USA.
Monisha SharmaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7599-1561
Danielle ResarClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3865-9523
Masabho MilaliDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, 10016, USA.
Edinah MudimuUniversity of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5479-9255
Linxuan WuDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7240-5412
Cory ArrouzetDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Ingrida PlataisDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, 10016, USA.
Hae-Young KimDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, 10016, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-1555
Sarah JenkinsClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5667-095X
Anna BershteynDepartment of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, 10016, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6604-7093

Funding

Drug concentration measurement for HIV prevention targets: toward a population-based HIV impact assessment (PHIA) for PrEPR01AI179417 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Anna Bershteyn, Dobromir Dimitrov · 2024 to 2026
$2.5M
Children's Investment Foundation Fund (CIFF)Gates Foundation INV-038274NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI179417US National Institutes of Health R01AI179417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAffordable HIV prevention tools are needed in Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA). Several promising long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) products are available or in development. However, ESA settings face severe healthcare resource constraints. We aimed to estimate the threshold price at which LA-PrEP products could be cost-effective in three ESA settings.

methodsWe adapted an agent-based model, EMOD-HIV, to simulate LA-PrEP (monthly oral, 2- and 6-monthly injectable) rollout in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Kenya. Due to uncertainties about LA-PrEP use, we examined a range of coverages (5%-20% of HIV-negative sexually active adults) and extents to which LA-PrEP use will be concentrated among those most at risk (prioritized rollout from higher- to lower-risk groups vs. uniform rollout among sexually active adults). To evaluate a 20-year commitment to LA-PrEP delivery, we assumed LA-PrEP was scaled up to target coverage from 2025 to 2030 and maintained at target levels before ending in 2045. We estimated maximum per-dose and per-year LA-PrEP costs that achieve cost-effectiveness (<US$500 per disability-adjusted life-year averted) over 35 years (until 2060), compared to a scenario of daily oral PrEP only. Sensitivity analyses varied PrEP scale-up speeds and eligible populations.

resultsRisk-prioritized LA-PrEP for 5% of adults was projected to avert 11-21% of HIV acquisitions across settings, with 3-5 times more HIV acquisitions averted and 3-5 times higher maximum cost compared to non-prioritized rollout. Six-monthly injectable PrEP supported the highest per-dose cost: in the scenario with the most cost-effective LA-PrEP use (5% risk-prioritized rollout), the maximum per-dose price in South Africa was $52.99 (95% CI: $48.82-$57.21), in Zimbabwe $14.64 (95% CI: $12.04-$17.38) and in western Kenya $7.50 (95% CI: $6.73-$8.27). For monthly oral PrEP, corresponding per-dose costs were $5.02 (95% CI: $4.67-$5.37), $1.45 (95% CI: $1.10-$1.79) and $0.87 (95% CI: $0.80-$0.93). Results were sensitive to eligible population and prioritization, and moderately sensitive to scale-up speed and product effectiveness.

conclusionsLA-PrEP is likely to require reduced pricing and/or risk-prioritized rollout to be cost-effective in ESA.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultAfrica, EasternAfrica, SouthernCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansKenyaMaleModels, TheoreticalAnti-HIV AgentsAfricaHIVlenacapavirlong‐actingmodellingpre‐exposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID39995017
PMCPMC11850439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.