Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994964›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Changes in Local Government Priorities and Stakeholder Satisfaction Following a Healthy Drinks Capacity-Building Intervention in Sports and Recreation Facilities in Victoria, Australia.

Miranda R Blake, Devorah Riesenberg, Tara Boelsen-Robinson, Adrian J Cameron, Anna Peeters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miranda R BlakeInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0649-2320
Devorah RiesenbergInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2797-2574
Tara Boelsen-RobinsonInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1671-3091
Adrian J CameronInstitute for Health Transformation, Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0568-5497
Anna PeetersInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9132

Funding

Deakin UniversityNational Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)National Heart FoundationVicHealth
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedLocal government (LG) facilities such as libraries, clubs and sport and recreation centres generally offer and promote nutritionally poor foods that may contribute to excess energy intake. It is unclear what effect exposure to a healthy food retail initiative may have on customer and staff support for such changes. This study investigated the association of a healthy drink intervention in LG-owned sporting facilities on changes in (i) intervention LG attitudes and facility healthy food and drink provision, compared to control LGs; and (ii) intervention LG customer and staff support for the intervention.

methodsEight Victorian LGs implemented a two-year intervention to limit sugary drink availability in LG-owned sporting facilities. At baseline (2018) and follow-up (2020), attitudinal surveys were sent to intervention LG staff (baseline: n = 162; follow-up: n = 183) and customers (baseline: n = 1079; follow-up: n = 1188), and policy surveys were sent to all state LGs. Baseline and follow-up responses, and policy survey responses between 8 intervention and 24 control LGs were compared using logistic regression.

resultsIntervention LGs' baseline priorities for promoting healthy eating were higher than control LGs, with no change in priorities at follow-up. Intervention LG staff and customers' belief that sporting facilities should promote healthy eating remained high between baseline (customers 79%; staff 76%) and follow-up (customers 75%; staff: 73%).

conclusionsFacility staff and customers support interventions to align sporting facilities' healthy lifestyle message with healthier food environments. SO WHAT?: LG prioritisation of healthy eating appears to be a prerequisite for LG healthy drink policies.

Indexed as

BeveragesCapacity BuildingDiet, HealthyHealth PromotionLocal GovernmentSports and Recreational FacilitiesStakeholder ParticipationAdultFemaleHumansMaleSportsSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriaAustralialocal governmentnutrition policysports

Identifiers

PMID39994964
PMCPMC11850953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.