Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994924›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025

Caregivers influence preferred place of death for patients with an advanced cancer.

Chetna Malhotra, Shravya Murali, Isha Chaudhry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chetna MalhotraHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5380-0525
Shravya MuraliHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Isha ChaudhryLien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFamily caregivers influence realization of home death among advanced cancer patients. However, little is known about the caregiver factors influencing patients' preferred and actual place of death. We aimed to assess caregiver factors associated with both caregivers' and patients' preferred place of death, and the association between their preferred and actual place of death.

methodsFrom a prospective cohort of 600 patients with stage IV solid malignancy, and 311 caregivers, we analyzed data for 227 patient-caregiver dyads of deceased patients who responded to the question on preferred place of death for patients at least once within the last 3 years before death. We assessed the association of patients' and caregivers' preferred place of death for patients with caregivers' competency, employment, relationship quality with the patient, their relationship with the patient, family support, and the presence of a domestic helper. We controlled for relevant patient factors and utilized the actor-partner interdependence framework for analysis.

resultsOverall, 67% patients and 74% caregivers preferred a home death for patients during the last 3 years prior to patient's death. Patients whose caregivers reported greater caregiving competency were more likely to prefer a home death (average marginal effect: 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.04). Spousal caregivers were less likely to prefer a home death (-0.10 (-0.19, -0.004)). Caregivers lacking family support were more likely to prefer an institutional death (0.04 (0.002-0.08)). While caregivers' preferences had a marginally significant association with patients' actual place of death ( SIGNIFICANCE OF

resultsCaregivers play a crucial role in shaping patients' preferred and actual place of death. Supporting caregivers, particularly spousal caregivers, and enhancing their caregiving competency could potentially help achieve a home death for the patient.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathCaregiversNeoplasmsPatient PreferenceTerminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvanced cancercohort studiesfamily caregiverspatient preference

Identifiers

PMID39994924
PMCPMC13166561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.