Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994911›Full record

SynthesisHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Lung Cancer Screening Participation Among Indigenous Peoples Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Opportunities.

Sewunet Admasu Belachew, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Abbey Diaz, Shafkat Jahan, Sue Crengle, Kwun Fong, Gail Garvey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Lung Cancer Screening Access and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Among American Indian and White Patients.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sewunet Admasu BelachewFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-8188
Habtamu Mellie BizuayehuFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-4909
Abbey DiazFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-311X
Shafkat JahanFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0447-8664
Sue CrengleThe Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-1492
Kwun FongThoracic Research Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-1403
Gail GarveyFirst Nations Cancer and Wellbeing Research Program, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-5716

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) funded Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) in Targeted Approaches to Improve Cancer Services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians (TACTICS) 1153027NHMRC Investigator 1176651University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedLung cancer screening (LCS) is crucial for Indigenous populations due to their higher lung cancer incidence rates and poorer outcomes. Despite efforts to establish LCS programmes, evidence on LCS cost-effectiveness, participation rates, facilitators and barriers for Indigenous peoples remains limited. This systematic review aims to address this gap by reviewing available evidence.

methodsThis systematic review conducted searches for relevant articles in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar and references/citations of included articles.

resultsFifteen out of 19 eligible studies were conducted in the USA, three in New Zealand and one in Canada, with 23 715 Indigenous participants in the 15 quantitative studies. New Zealand studies found that LCS is cost-effective for Māori, while the participation rate for American Indian/Alaska Natives (4.7%) was lower than for White Americans (21.7%). Facilitators included positive views of LCS, trust in Indigenous-centred care/providers, trusted invitations, family and community support, transportation or flexible scheduling, culturally competent navigators and detailed health education. Barriers included limited knowledge about LCS/eligibility criteria, fear of the screening process or cancer diagnosis, mistrust or negative experiences in healthcare, cost and time constraints, limited transportation/resources and non-inclusive eligibility criteria.

conclusionsFurther research is needed to understand the LCS among Indigenous peoples. Enhancing LCS participation requires leveraging positive experiences and addressing barriers with culturally tailored education and strategic resource allocation. SO WHAT?: For Australia and similar countries preparing for LCSPs, global evidence highlights the need for adequate resources, integration of Indigenous cultural practices and active involvement of Indigenous communities in programme planning.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerIndigenous PeoplesLung NeoplasmsAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeCanadaHumansMaori PeopleNew ZealandUnited StatesAustraliaFirst Nations Peopleslung cancerreviewscreening

Identifiers

PMID39994911
PMCPMC11850951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.