Observational studyHead & face medicine2025
Influence of orthodontic archwire (nickel-titanium versus copper-nickel-titanium) on pain in adult patients in the aligning phase of treatment with self-ligating brackets (two months of follow-up): a prospective observational pilot study.
Observational study in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this pilot study was to analyze the influence of a nickel-titanium archwire (NiTi) and a copper-nickel-titanium archwire (Cu-NiTi) on pain levels in adult patients during the first two months of orthodontic treatment with self-ligating brackets.
methodsThis prospective observational pilot study was carried out at the Dental Clinic of the University of Salamanca between 2023 and 2024. This study analyzed 30 adult orthodontic patients who began treatment with self-ligating brackets. The participants were distributed into two study groups (n = 15) for treatment with initial NiTi and Cu-NiTi archwires. At the beginning, a 0.014-inch archwire was used, and a 0.016-inch archwire was used after a month. The level of pain was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) at the beginning of treatment (T0), at one month (T1), and at two months (T2). At each time point (T0, T1, and T2), pain was measured at baseline and at 4, 24, and 48 h after archwire placement or replacement. The data were analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient and the Mann-Whitney test (p < 0.05).
resultsThe mean age of the participants (n = 30) was 31.34 (± 6.05) years. The maximum pain peak was in the first 48 h after placing the initial archwire (5.57 ± 1.72). The age and sex of the participants did not influence the pain levels in the sample studied. The composition of the orthodontic archwire only influenced the pain levels at the beginning of treatment (T0) (p < 0.05); in this case, the NiTi group (1.73 ± 1.53) described a higher level of pain than that of the Cu-NiTi group (1.07 ± 1.36); in the rest of the follow-up period, no significant differences were observed.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, we observed that the orthodontic archwire material (nickel-titanium versus copper-nickel-titanium) only influenced pain levels at the beginning of orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.