ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
The impact of anti-TNF-α therapy on leptin and inflammatory markers in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a case-control study.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Iguratimod combined with traditional anti-rheumatic drugs in treating rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective study.BMC immunology · 2026Article
- Reexamining Fat: Exploring Diversity, Plasticity, Development, Functional Implication, and Therapeutic Options.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation, cartilage, and bone destruction. Several studies have shown that leptin plays an important role in the pathophysiology of RA disease. This study aimed to evaluate serum levels of leptin in RA patients receiving biologic drugs compared to RA patients managed by non-biologic drugs, and healthy individuals. METHODS AND MATERIAL: In this case-control study, three groups including RA patients receiving biological drugs (remission RA patients; n = 20), RA patients receiving DMARDs (active RA patients; n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 20) were included. Serum leptin levels and inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), were measured in all participants. These measurements were subsequently compared across the three groups. Also, the correlation between leptin and inflammatory markers in each group was evaluated.
resultsIn this study serum leptin levels in remission RA patients, active RA patients, and healthy individuals were 14.49 ± 6.73, 16.94 ± 7.72, and 7.59 ± 5.94, respectively. Serum leptin level was significantly higher in patients with RA compared to healthy controls. No significant difference was observed in serum leptin levels between the two groups of RA patients (P < 0.001). There was a lost correlation between leptin and inflammatory markers in patients with active RA. However, a new correlation between leptin and inflammatory markers emerged in RA patients receiving biological drugs.
conclusionOur findings suggest that anti-TNF-alpha agents do not modulate serum leptin levels in RA patients. However, these agents may change a correlation between leptin and C-reactive protein (CRP) that is absent in patients with active RA.
trial registrationNot applicable in case control study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.