ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
I don't mind my information going to the Moon, but I don't want any letters from Mars: a qualitative exploration of the challenges with secondary use of health data in Ireland.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in Neurological Health Care: Qualitative Study of Patient and Public Perceptions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- What patients value in data reuse for oncology research: a multi-stakeholder qualitative study to inform the European Health Data Space implementation in Belgium and beyond.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- If it wasn't for us, there would be no data: stakeholders' perspectives on patient involvement in the use of health data in Ireland.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecondary use of health data is important for public and individual health due to its potential to drive research and healthcare improvement; however, there are challenges to be managed from a socio-ethical, legal and technological perspective. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore knowledge, experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders towards secondary use of health data in Ireland, with a specific focus on the challenges with secondary use.
methodsThe study employed a qualitative cross-sectional approach in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Thirty-five people participated in the study, with seven participants in each of the five focus groups: academics and researchers; healthcare professionals; data controllers, ethics and privacy experts; industry group; and patients and public. Two thirds of the sample were female, and over half of participants were between 35 and 54 years of age. Participants were recruited through purposive and snowballing method. Data was collected through focus group discussions, transcribed and analysed thematically.
resultsThe participants across all study groups were supportive of secondary use of health data; however, significant challenges were identified. The four main categories of challenges were related to (1) health data use, (2) ethics, (3) health data ecosystem and (4) social inequalities. Specifically, insufficient collection and low quality of health data, alongside issues regarding access, linking and sharing are a significant barrier to effective secondary use. This is further complicated by complex ethical approval processes and requirements around data protection. The fragmented national Information Technology (IT) and data infrastructure and limited resources further hamper secondary use, and concerns about low health literacy among the public and negative experiences with the healthcare system influence patients' willingness to share data for secondary use.
conclusionsThis study identified the multi-layered and intersecting challenges in the Irish health data ecosystem around secondary use, and highlighted the need for structural improvements, reform of ethical processes, integration of disadvantaged communities, and education and awareness-raising among the public. A careful consideration of these challenges on a national level is required to enable effective secondary use of health data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.