Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994771›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

I don't mind my information going to the Moon, but I don't want any letters from Mars: a qualitative exploration of the challenges with secondary use of health data in Ireland.

Tina Bedenik, Caitriona Cahir, Kathleen E Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tina BedenikData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland. tinabedenik@rcsi.ie.
Caitriona CahirData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Kathleen E BennettData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) and FutureNeuro industry partner IQVIA 21/RC/10294_P2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary use of health data is important for public and individual health due to its potential to drive research and healthcare improvement; however, there are challenges to be managed from a socio-ethical, legal and technological perspective. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore knowledge, experiences and perspectives of key stakeholders towards secondary use of health data in Ireland, with a specific focus on the challenges with secondary use.

methodsThe study employed a qualitative cross-sectional approach in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Thirty-five people participated in the study, with seven participants in each of the five focus groups: academics and researchers; healthcare professionals; data controllers, ethics and privacy experts; industry group; and patients and public. Two thirds of the sample were female, and over half of participants were between 35 and 54 years of age. Participants were recruited through purposive and snowballing method. Data was collected through focus group discussions, transcribed and analysed thematically.

resultsThe participants across all study groups were supportive of secondary use of health data; however, significant challenges were identified. The four main categories of challenges were related to (1) health data use, (2) ethics, (3) health data ecosystem and (4) social inequalities. Specifically, insufficient collection and low quality of health data, alongside issues regarding access, linking and sharing are a significant barrier to effective secondary use. This is further complicated by complex ethical approval processes and requirements around data protection. The fragmented national Information Technology (IT) and data infrastructure and limited resources further hamper secondary use, and concerns about low health literacy among the public and negative experiences with the healthcare system influence patients' willingness to share data for secondary use.

conclusionsThis study identified the multi-layered and intersecting challenges in the Irish health data ecosystem around secondary use, and highlighted the need for structural improvements, reform of ethical processes, integration of disadvantaged communities, and education and awareness-raising among the public. A careful consideration of these challenges on a national level is required to enable effective secondary use of health data.

Indexed as

eHealthHealth dataPatient and public involvementQualitative researchSecondary useTrust

Identifiers

PMID39994771
PMCPMC11849380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.