ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Analysis of risk factors and construction of prediction model for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis after liver transplantation.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) is a serious and potentially fatal complication with a high incidence following liver transplantation, significantly affecting patient prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and risk factors associated with LEDVT post-transplantation and to develop an effective clinical prediction model.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 298 liver transplant recipients at Hebei Medical University Third Hospital between January 2021 and April 2024. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. Baseline variables, including demographics, smoking history, comorbidities, surgical data, and biochemical indicators at admission, were collected. The training set data were used to construct the predictive model. Relevant predictors were identified using non-parametric rank-sum tests, chi-square tests, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. A multivariate logistic regression model was then developed to optimize these predictors and generate a nomogram. Model performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curve analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Validation of the model was conducted using the independent validation set.
resultsLEDVT occurred in 28 (13.5%) of the 208 patients in the training cohort. LASSO regression identified smoking history, hyperlipidemia, intraoperative blood loss, and elevated D-dimer levels as independent predictors of LEDVT after liver transplantation. A nomogram was constructed based on these predictors, with risk scores assigned to each variable (as depicted in Fig. 3). Higher total scores were associated with an increased likelihood of LEDVT. The predictive model demonstrated satisfactory discrimination and calibration, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) indicating good predictive accuracy. The calibration plot, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and DCA further confirmed the model's clinical utility.
conclusionsThe developed prediction model exhibited excellent performance in identifying patients at high risk for LEDVT following liver transplantation. Early identification of at-risk individuals allows for timely intervention, potentially reducing LEDVT incidence and improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, this model has significant implications for reducing healthcare costs and optimizing resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.