Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994746›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025

Who's On Your Team? Classifying Dementia Caregiving Networks and Associations With the Well-being of Caregivers and Care Recipients With Dementia.

Amanda N Leggett, Srabani Haldar, Sophia Tsuker, Wenhua Lai, Natasha Nemmers, HwaJung Choi, Vicki Freedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Friend Caregivers Among Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
  2. Caregivers serving as confidants: relationship correlates and well-being by care-recipients' dementia status.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda N LeggettInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7895-3862
Srabani HaldarInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Sophia TsukerInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Wenhua LaiInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4174-2476
Natasha NemmersInstitute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5221-3903
HwaJung ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Vicki FreedmanInstitute of Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4604-4207

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG072931 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ana Marie Daugherty · 2021 to 2026
$26.5M
Profiling Psychosocial Dementia Caregiving Networks: The Impact of Dementia Care Networks on Care Outcomes of Medicare Enrollee Persons Living with DementiaR01AG079097 · NIA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LEGGETT, AMANDA NOEL · 2022 to 2025
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079097NIA NIH HHS R01AG079097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhile caregivers are typically enmeshed in broad networks of family and friends assisting with care, this network has been neglected in favor of examining a "primary" caregiver. This study examines types of family and unpaid friend networks for individuals with dementia and how one's network type relates to the well-being of care recipients with dementia and their caregivers.

methodsData are drawn from the nationally representative 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and associated National Study of Caregiving. The sample includes 336 dementia care networks (network size mean = 2.9). We first identified network types using latent class analysis and then examined the extent to which network type is associated with the well-being of care recipients with dementia (sleep, depressive symptoms) and their caregivers (emotional difficulty, overload, social support from family and friends) using ANOVA and linear regressions adjusting for demographics.

results3 network types were identified: "Siloed"-small networks, limited task sharing (29.8% of networks); "Small but Mighty"-small networks, high task sharing (23.0% of networks); and "Complex"-large networks, diverse membership, members who share and specialize in task assistance (47.2%). Individuals with dementia with a "Siloed" network had significantly poorer sleep quality and caregivers in "Siloed" networks reported receiving less social support from family and friends than those in "Small but Mighty" and "Complex" networks. DISCUSSION: Caregiver networks that are less collaborative may need supports to reduce isolation among caregivers and improve health outcomes for individuals with dementia.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFamilyFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesCaregiver networkCaregiver well-beingDementia caregivingKinship caregiving

Identifiers

PMID39994746
PMCPMC12059475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.