ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
Feasibility and reliability of an online version of the beat alignment test in neurotypical adults and people with stroke.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Special collection in association with the 2024 International Conference on Aging, Innovation and Rehabilitation.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRhythm-based rehabilitation interventions are gaining attention and measuring their effects is critical. With more clinical care and research being conducted online, it is important to determine the feasibility of measuring rhythm abilities online. However, some tools used to measure rhythm abilities, in particular the beat alignment test (BAT), have not been validated for online delivery. This study aims to determine the feasibility, reliability, and learning effects for online delivery of the BAT in adults with and without stroke.
methodsNeurotypical adults and adults with chronic stroke completed the BAT online three times, with testing sessions separated by 2 to 4 days. The BAT includes a perception task (identifying whether tones overlayed on music matched the beat of the music) and a production task (tapping to the beat of music). Feasibility was evaluated with completion rates, technical challenges and resolutions, participant experience via exit questionnaire, and test duration. Reliability was measured using inter-class correlations and standard error of measurement, and learning effects were determined using a repeated-measures ANOVA.
resultsThirty-nine neurotypical adults and 23 adults with stroke participated in this study. More a priori feasibility criteria for the online BAT were met with neurotypical adults than people with stroke. Most components of the online BAT were considered reliable based on an ICC = 0.60 cut-off, except for perception in the neurotypical group, and production asynchrony in the stroke group. There was notable variability in performance, but no learning effects in either group.
conclusionsOnline administration of the BAT is more feasible for neurotypical adults than people with stroke. Challenges with online administration for people with stroke may be partly related to the delivery platform. The BAT is a reliable tool with no learning effects and therefore is a promising way to assess for rhythm abilities online with careful consideration of user interface for people with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.