ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Characteristics and outcomes for hip fracture patients in an integrated orthogeriatric care model: a descriptive study of four discharge pathways with one-year follow-up.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Femoral Arterial Calcification, Atherogenic Index of Plasma, and 1-Year Mortality After Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Full-Body Versus Local Wipe Disinfection With Chlorhexidine Gluconate: No Difference in Surgical Site Infection After Acute Hip Fracture Surgery.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Towards an Integrated Person-Centred Care Pathway to Support the Recovery Journey Post Hip Fracture: A Qualitative Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Clinical profiles and outcomes of different therapeutic protocols in elderly patients with trochanteric fractures: a descriptive study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Difference in discharge disposition, adherence to clinical care standards and functional outcomes of older hip fracture patients receiving an orthogeriatric model of care versus routine care.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Time Is Bone: Missed Opportunities for Secondary Prevention After a Hip Fracture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthogeriatric hospital care is recommended for hip fra cture patients, but differentiated hospital care has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to describe physical performance and health-related quality of life for hip fracture patients 1-year after surgery in four treatment pathways. We also report changes in functional outcomes from baseline to 1-year follow-up together with readmission and mortality rates for each pathway.
methodsWe included 177 hip fracture patients aged 65 years or older from a single center in Norway. Participants were discharged home, to specialised rehabilitation, regular rehabilitation or nursing home based on orthogeriatric assessment of pre- and postfracture function, mobility level and Ac tivities of Daily Living. Outcome variables included Short Physical Performance Battery, EuroQol-5-dimension-5-level, Barthel-index, Lawton & Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, Lawton & Brody Self-Maintenance Scale, readmission and mortality rates during follow-up.
resultsParticipants discharged home and to specialised rehabilitation were younger and healthier than participants discharged to regular rehabilitation and nursing home. All groups had a clinically important improvement in Short Physical Performance Battery score (mean 4.8 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2, 5.5) from post-surgery to 1-year follow-up and a clinically important decline in EuroQol-5-dimension-5-level (mean -0.12 points, CI -0.16, -0.07) from baseline to 1-year follow-up. The decline in Barthel-index from baseline to 1-year follow-up was greater in the regular rehabilitation group (mean -2.3 points, CI -4.2, -0.2) than in the home group (mean -0.6 points, CI -1.4, 0.2) and specialised rehabilitation group (mean -0.4 points, CI -2.4, 1.6). Participants in the regular rehabilitation group were more frequently readmitted (standardised Pearson residual 4.1) and mortality rates were higher in the nursing home group (standardised Pearson residual 7.8) during the first year.
conclusionsOrthogeriatric treatment pathways for hip fracture patients entailed differentiation based on factors such as age, mobility, comorbidity and physical function. Participants in all pathways improved in physical performance-scores, yet experienced decline in quality of life-scores during follow-up. Overall readmission and mortality rates were not influenced, but varied between pathways. Further research is needed to investigate the need for differentiated hospital treatment and its potential effects on rehabilitation after discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.