Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994678›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2025

Gamification in midwifery education: a systematic review.

Tahereh Fathi Najafi, Nafise Andaroon, Nasibeh Bolghanabadi, Neda Sharifi, Sareh Dashti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tahereh Fathi NajafiDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad Medical sciences, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Nafise AndaroonDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad Medical sciences, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Nasibeh BolghanabadiDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad Medical sciences, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Neda SharifiDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad Medical sciences, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Sareh DashtiDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad Medical sciences, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran. sareh_dashti@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesMidwifery education requires the integration of thought and practical knowledge and skills. Therefore, new education methods, including gamification based education, might be able to improve midwifery education. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of gamification in midwifery education. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis systematic review was conducted on both observational and experimental (quasi-experimental and randomized controlled trials) published articles in PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web Of Science till March 2024. All articles in English language that evaluated gamification-based education in midwifery or nurse-midwifery education were evaluated.

resultsOf the primary 268 articles, 6 articles (three cross-sectional and three intervention studies) were eligible for review. All studies used serious game method for educating on different aspects of care. Both digital and non-digital games were found to be more effective than traditional education in the reviewed studies. Satisfaction with game based education was lower than traditional method in one study.

conclusionsGamification based education can be a promising method for educating midwifery and nurse-midwifery students due to their efficiency in improving students' knowledge and skills especially in practical fields.

Indexed as

MidwiferyClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansGamificationHealth careMidwifery educationNursing

Identifiers

PMID39994678
PMCPMC11853571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.