Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994664›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

Insights for dementia risk reduction among lower SES adults in OECD countries: scoping review of interventions targeting multiple common health risk factors.

Amy L Coates, Hannah L Fair, Emma J Lea, Kathleen V Doherty

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy L CoatesWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. amy.coates@utas.edu.au.
Hannah L FairWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Emma J LeaWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Kathleen V DohertyWicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of people living with dementia is expected to rise to 153 million cases globally by 2050. This will come at a high economic and human cost to societies with disproportionate effects on socioeconomically disadvantaged groups who experience greater exposures to- and fewer protections from- the environmental, social and behavioural drivers of dementia risk. Almost half (45%) of dementia incidence could theoretically be prevented or delayed by addressing 14 modifiable risk factors. While several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of multidomain dementia risk reduction interventions in relatively older, educated and wealthy populations, we are not aware of any studies to date explicitly targeting younger adults (< 50 years) with lower socioeconomic status. To inform future strategies, we conducted a scoping review of intervention studies targeting multiple 'dementia-related' risk factors among adults with lower socioeconomic status in developed country contexts. We identified 1003 unique records; 34 met our criteria for inclusion - involving more than 17,500 participants from 13 countries. While none of the studies explicitly targeted dementia risk reduction, they reported on 30 relevant multidomain interventions targeting common risk factors associated with dementia including; diet (28), physical inactivity (27), obesity (22), diabetes (9), hypertension (8), smoking (6), alcohol use (6), depression (3) and social isolation (1). While most studies recorded positive effects on one or more health behaviours, there was a diversity in the design, approach and outcomes of interventions, with significant intervention effects being associated with the use of a wider range of behaviour change techniques. We suggest that designing interventions to reduce dementia risk and disparities requires a high degree of contextual specificity and propose a structured and participatory approach.

Indexed as

DementiaRisk Reduction BehaviorSocial ClassAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentRisk FactorsAlzheimer’s diseaseDementiaHealth equityLow socioeconomic statusPreventionRisk reduction

Identifiers

PMID39994664
PMCPMC11853287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.