ArticleBMC surgery2025
A modified approach for treating zygomatic arch fracture with plate fixation: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuro-immune-bone axis in post-traumatic bone regeneration: temporal regulation, dysregulation mechanisms, and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundZygomatic complex fractures are prevalent among maxillofacial bone injuries due to the prominence of the zygomatic arch, which can significantly impact facial aesthetics and the ability to open the mouth. Although non-surgical interventions are available for mild cases, severe fractures necessitate surgical intervention. The surgical repair of zygomatic arch fractures poses a risk of injuring the temporal branch of the facial nerve (TBFN). This study aimed to develop a modern modification to reduce the probability of common complications.
methodWe conducted a retrospective study involving 163 patients at the Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, spanning from March 2021 to June 2024. Our study introduced a novel modification of the temporal hairline approach for the treatment of these fractures.
resultsAmong the patients who underwent the modified approach (n = 38), there were no instances of TBFN injuries. In contrast, the traditional approach (n = 125) resulted in 17 cases of nerve-related complications.
conclusionOur findings indicate that the modified temporal hairline approach offers distinct advantages in minimizing the risk of TBFN injury with minimally noticeable scarring, while ensuring that the fracture is securely repaired. This provides a new safe surgical approach option for the osteosynthesis of zygomatic arch fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.