ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding food-medicine dual-purpose substances among adults in China: a cross-sectional online survey.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insights into knowledge, attitudes, and practices of medicinal plant use in the United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFood medicine homology originated in ancient China and has been officially named food-medicine dual-purpose substances (FMS). However, the relationship between residents' knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP) and FMS among adults in China remains unclear. This study evaluated the current situation of FMS-related knowledge, awareness and actual consumption behaviors and practices of Chinese residents to provide a basis for both perfect related regulations and scientific advice on FMS consumption.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey on FMS perception and consumption was conducted through a convenience sampling strategy from August to December 2020. A total of 2,815 residents (96.3% were aged between 18 and 50 years old, 47.8% were male and 52.2% were female) from 31 provinces were recruited for this study. Descriptive analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed in the statistical analysis.
resultsThe results showed that residents' identification of FMS had an accurate response rate of 22.7% (640/2,815). Educational level was the factor associated with residents' knowledge of FMS. A total of 62.0% (1,744/2,815) of the residents would take the initiative to learn more about FMS. 93.8% (2,639/2,815) of them thought that manufacturers should make clear food labels when they add FMS. Almost half of the residents bought FMS products frequently (more than 12 times per year), and 96.1% (1,880/2,747) of the residents bought FMS mainly used for healthcare. Among the FMS they had ever consumed, the two most frequently consumed FMS by residents were yam (35.3%) and wolfberry (15.9%). 40.6%(1,143/2,815) of residents hoped that the government could increase publicity and conduct more popular science activities.
conclusionThe findings indicate that adult residents in China who have substantial knowledge of FMS are not optimistic; however, they express positive attitudes toward knowing and consuming FMS, and there is a high need for labeling and a high demand for consumption. It is imperative to enhance research and policy development regarding FMS, to actively promote FMS knowledge, and to guide residents towards a more scientific and rational consumption of FMS in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.