Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994630›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Factors associated with upper extremity use after stroke: a scoping review of accelerometry studies.

Léandre Gagné-Pelletier, Isabelle Poitras, Marc Roig, Catherine Mercier

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Léandre Gagné-PelletierSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Isabelle PoitrasSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Marc RoigSchool of Physical & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Qc, H3G 1Y5, Canada.
Catherine MercierSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. catherine.mercier@rea.ulaval.ca.

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 251649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA discrepancy between the level of impairment at the upper extremity (UE) and its use in activities of daily life is frequently observed in individuals who have experienced a stroke. Wrist-worn accelerometers allow an objective and valid measure of UE use in everyday life. Accelerometer studies have shown that a wide range of factors beyond UE impairment can influence UE use. This scoping review aims to identify factors associated with UE use and to investigate the influence of different types of accelerometry metrics on these associations.

methodA search using CINHAL, Embase, MEDLINE, Compendex, and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed. Studies that assessed the association between UE use quantified with accelerometers and factors related to the person or their environment in individuals with stroke were included. Data related to study design, participants characteristics, accelerometry methodology (absolute vs. relative UE use metrics), and associations with personal and environmental factors were extracted.

resultsFifty-four studies were included. Multiple studies consistently reported associations between relative UE use and stroke severity, UE motor impairment, unimanual capacity, bimanual capacity, and mobility. In contrast, there were inconsistent associations with factors such as neglect and concordance between dominance and side of paresis and a consistent lack of association between relative UE use and time since stroke, sex, and age. Metrics of absolute paretic UE use yielded different results regarding their association with personal and environmental factors, as they were more influenced by factors related to physical activity and less associated with factors related to UE capacity.

conclusionHealthcare providers should recognize the complexity of the relationship between UE use and impairment and consider additional factors when selecting assessments during rehabilitation to identify patients at risk of underutilizing their paretic arm in daily life. Future research in this domain should preconize relative UE use metrics or multi-sensors method to control for the effect of physical activity.

Indexed as

AccelerometryActivities of Daily LivingStrokeStroke RehabilitationUpper ExtremityHumansAccelerometryCerebrovascular accidentRehabilitationSensorsUpper limbUse ratio

Identifiers

PMID39994630
PMCPMC11849390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.