ArticleBMC public health2025
Sedentary work and expanding waistlines: a cross-sectional study on occupational roles and abdominal obesity in India.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal obesity in India: sex stratified multilevel estimates across 707 districts from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and determinants of obesity among women aged 15-49 years in the Ashanti region, Ghana: Analysis of the 2022 Ghana demographic and health survey.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Have sedentary lifestyles reached even remote parts of the Global South? Evidence from school-going adolescents' time use in India.PloS one · 2026Article
- Differential impact of general and abdominal obesity on the labor-bone health association: a cross-sectional study in rural China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype in relation to diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in the Indonesian and Korean populations: evidence from two national surveys.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Article
- Lipid Accumulation and Insulin Resistance: Bridging Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Exploring Sedentary and Nutritional Behaviour Patterns in Relation to Overweight and Obesity Among Youth from Different Demographic Backgrounds in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Unveiling the twin epidemics of hypertension and diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis of sex-specific prevalence, risk, and hotspots in India's epidemiological transition zones.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Prevalence of non-communicable disease and the associated factors among healthcare workers in Qatar.BMC primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow- and middle-income countries are undergoing epidemiological and demographic transitions alongside economic growth, contributing to a rise in abdominal obesity. In India, the increase in sedentary occupations and insufficient physical activity are key drivers of this growing health concern. This study investigates the relationship between occupational types and abdominal obesity markers in well-characterised adults, accounting for a wide range of confounders.
methodsUsing a nationally representative sample of 99,653 women and 91,990 men, occupations were categorised into sedentary work (SW), non-sedentary work (NSW), and not working (NW). Two outcomes were assessed: abdominal obesity, measured via waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) using WHO cutoffs, and a higher-risk threshold of WHR ≥ 1. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for socioeconomic and demographic factors, were conducted to evaluate the risk of abdominal obesity by occupation type.
resultsAmong women, abdominal obesity prevalence based on WHO criteria was 56% (95% CI: 55.60-56.46), highest in NW (57.3%; 95% CI: 56.80-57.83), followed by SW (57.1%; 95% CI: 55.39-58.78) and NSW (51.5%; 95% CI: 50.63-52.43). Among men, prevalence was 48.9% (95% CI: 48.31-49.46), highest in SW (57.8%; 95% CI: 56.51-59.14), followed by NSW (49.9%; 95% CI: 49.15-50.63) and NW (37.3%; 95% CI: 36.14-38.43). Adjusted odds of abdominal obesity were significantly higher for SW compared to NSW (women: aOR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14; men: aOR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.16-1.25).
conclusionsHigh prevalence of abdominal obesity among both men and women implies an emerging health risk in India. The findings that contributed to associations between sedentary occupation and abdominal obesity may inform occupation-related health risks and development of interventions to limit daily sitting at work place which may reduce metabolic disease risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.