Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994620›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Sedentary work and expanding waistlines: a cross-sectional study on occupational roles and abdominal obesity in India.

Rituparna Sengupta, Rimjhim Bajpai, Sudheer Kumar Shukla, Navin Singh, Nishikant Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rituparna Sengupta *Monitoring and Research Division, National Health Authority, New Delhi, India.
Rimjhim BajpaiPopulation Council Consulting, New Delhi, India.
Sudheer Kumar ShuklaHealth Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi, India.
Navin SinghKing George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Nishikant Singh *Health Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi, India. nishiiips@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow- and middle-income countries are undergoing epidemiological and demographic transitions alongside economic growth, contributing to a rise in abdominal obesity. In India, the increase in sedentary occupations and insufficient physical activity are key drivers of this growing health concern. This study investigates the relationship between occupational types and abdominal obesity markers in well-characterised adults, accounting for a wide range of confounders.

methodsUsing a nationally representative sample of 99,653 women and 91,990 men, occupations were categorised into sedentary work (SW), non-sedentary work (NSW), and not working (NW). Two outcomes were assessed: abdominal obesity, measured via waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) using WHO cutoffs, and a higher-risk threshold of WHR ≥ 1. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for socioeconomic and demographic factors, were conducted to evaluate the risk of abdominal obesity by occupation type.

resultsAmong women, abdominal obesity prevalence based on WHO criteria was 56% (95% CI: 55.60-56.46), highest in NW (57.3%; 95% CI: 56.80-57.83), followed by SW (57.1%; 95% CI: 55.39-58.78) and NSW (51.5%; 95% CI: 50.63-52.43). Among men, prevalence was 48.9% (95% CI: 48.31-49.46), highest in SW (57.8%; 95% CI: 56.51-59.14), followed by NSW (49.9%; 95% CI: 49.15-50.63) and NW (37.3%; 95% CI: 36.14-38.43). Adjusted odds of abdominal obesity were significantly higher for SW compared to NSW (women: aOR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.14; men: aOR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.16-1.25).

conclusionsHigh prevalence of abdominal obesity among both men and women implies an emerging health risk in India. The findings that contributed to associations between sedentary occupation and abdominal obesity may inform occupation-related health risks and development of interventions to limit daily sitting at work place which may reduce metabolic disease risk.

Indexed as

Obesity, AbdominalOccupationsSedentary BehaviorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsWaist-Hip RatioAbdominal obesityIndiaNational Family Health SurveySedentary workWaist-to-hip ratio

Identifiers

PMID39994620
PMCPMC11849211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.