ArticleBMC public health2025
Regulation and governance for the implementation and management of point-of-care testing in Australia: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biosensor-Based Detection of Calprotectin and Lactoferrin as Neutrophil-Derived Markers of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: From Molecular Pathophysiology to Point-of-Care Platforms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Feasibility of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing for antibiotic stewardship in rural GP-pharmacy settings.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- APPLICATION LEVELS OF PRINCIPLES OF POCT IMPLEMENTATION, MANAGEMENT, AND MAINTENANCE THROUGH THE PERCEPTIONS OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS AT A TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN UYO, AKWA STATE, NIGERIA.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2025Article
- How to identify respiratory pathogens in primary health care - a review on the benefits, prospects and pitfalls in using point of care tests.Infection · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care testing (PoCT) is an increasingly important diagnostic tool in the healthcare system for accessible pathology testing in hospital, primary care, and community care settings. Clear regulation and governance models are important to ensure quality of PoCT results for patient care.
methodsThis review aimed to identify existing regulation and guidelines for management of PoCT and how this has been implemented within Australian healthcare services. We conducted a search of academic publications in PubMed and grey literature (national, state, and independent organisations) and other publicly available information from internet searches for governance of PoCT in Australia. Relevant data from these sources were extracted and narratively synthesised.
resultsForty-seven sources (17 studies from PubMed, 30 grey literature) were included in the final review. Of the grey literature sources, fifteen current PoCT governance documents comprising of six standards, five guidelines and four frameworks at the international, national and jurisdictional level were included with an increasing number of grey literature sources since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The seventeen included research articles were categorised according to implementation barriers and facilitators with the themes of workforce, clinical governance, PoCT workflow, and cost. An understanding of the clinical and cultural context for PoCT was the most frequently reported facilitator of PoCT, while the most frequently reported barrier was related to inadequate data management.
conclusionThis review demonstrated limited and inconsistent sources on regulatory and governance models for implementing and managing PoCT in Australia. Identified PoCT programs showcased diverse implementation and governance models to support quality PoCT, with few reporting formal accreditation. Streamlined, practical regulation and governance for PoCT may increase adoption across healthcare settings while ensuring quality results and meeting the needs of patients and healthcare practitioners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.