Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994481›Full record

ReviewEMBO molecular medicine2025

Pertussis before, during and after Covid-19.

Camille Locht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. History of whooping cough in Colombia: Endemic infant deaths, outbreaks and epidemicsBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Camille LochtUniv. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Centre for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France. Camille.locht@pasteur-lille.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7295-7336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the Covid-19 pandemic, pertussis has made a spectacular comeback in Europe and many other parts of the world, while during the pandemic it had essentially disappeared because of the social distancing requirements. However, even before the Covid-19 pandemic, the disease was on the rise in many countries, especially those that have replaced whole-cell pertussis vaccines by acellular pertussis vaccines. Several reasons may account for this upsurge, including strain adaptation to escape vaccine-induced immunity, rapid waning of immunity after vaccination and the failure of current vaccines to prevent infection by and transmission of the causative agent Bordetella pertussis. Various strategies have been deployed to control the disease, the most effective of which is maternal vaccination during pregnancy to protect the newborn against the most severe and deadly forms of the disease. However, ultimate control of pertussis likely requires novel vaccines, which prevent infection and transmission, not only disease. One of them is the live attenuated BPZE1 vaccine, which has shown promise in pre-clinical and clinical studies and may therefore perhaps become a gamechanger.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pertussis VaccineWhooping CoughBordetella pertussisFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2VaccinationPertussis VaccineAcellular VaccinesMucosal ImmunityWhole-cell VaccinesWhooping Cough

Identifiers

PMID39994481
PMCPMC11982557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.