Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994432›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning-enabled multiscale modeling platform for damage sensing digital twin in piezoelectric composite structures.

Somnath Ghosh, Saikat Dan, Preetam Tarafder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Somnath GhoshCivil & Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. sghosh20@jhu.edu.
Saikat DanCivil & Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Preetam TarafderCivil & Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.

Funding

US Air Force Office of Scientific Research FA9550-22-1-0351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of aerospace structures plays a crucial role in their successful operation under harsh environments. Most NDE methods, however, lack real-time in-situ predictive capabilities of evolving damage and are conducted in a post-mortem manner. This paper proposes a damage-sensing digital twin (DT) for piezoelectric composite structures incorporating microscale morphology and mechanisms into structural damage to address this shortcoming. The DT framework consists of a two-step computational process integrating multiscale-multiphysics modeling with machine learning (ML) tools to detect damage progression in the piezoelectric composite structure using electrical signal measurements at a few surface points. A parametrically upscaled coupled constitutive damage mechanics (PUCCDM) model is developed for this DT with the representation of microstructural morphology and mechanisms in macroscopic constitutive relations. Artificial neural network operates on micro-electro-mechanical data to derive PUCCDM constitutive coefficients as functions of underlying representative aggregated microstructural parameters (RAMPs). The PUCCDM model-simulated macroscopic electromechanical and damage fields, in conjunction with RAMPs, provide a comprehensive time-dependent dataset for a convolutional long-short-term memory (ConvLSTM) network to learn microstructure-dependent electrical and damage field correlations. The DT is consequently used to successfully predict location-specific damage from electrical signals at a limited number of sensors.

Indexed as

ConvLSTMElectromechanical-damage couplingMultiscale PUCCDM modelPiezoelectric compositeRepresentative aggregated microstructural parameters (RAMPs)

Identifiers

PMID39994432
PMCPMC11850843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.