Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994407›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Proper likelihood functions for parameter estimation in S-shaped models of unperturbed tumor growth.

Erick E Ramirez-Torres, Antonio R Selva Castañeda, Luis Rández, Scott A Sisson, Luis E Bergues Cabrales, Juan I Montijano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erick E Ramirez-Torres *Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Matemáticas y Aplicaciones, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Antonio R Selva CastañedaInstituto Universitario de Investigación de Matemáticas y Aplicaciones, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Luis RándezInstituto Universitario de Investigación de Matemáticas y Aplicaciones, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Scott A SissonUNSW Data Science Hub, and School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Luis E Bergues Cabrales *Departamento de Investigación e Innovación, Centro Nacional de Electromagnetismo Aplicado, Universidad de Oriente, Santiago de Cuba, Cuba. berguesc@yahoo.com.
Juan I Montijano *Instituto Universitario de Investigación de Matemáticas y Aplicaciones, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. monti@unizar.es.

Funding

Agencia estatal de investigación, Spain PID2022-141385NB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of unperturbed tumor growth kinetics, particularly the estimation of parameters for S-shaped equations used to describe growth, requires an appropriate likelihood function that accounts for the increasing error in solid tumor measurements as tumor size grows over time. This study aims to propose suitable likelihood functions for parameter estimation in S-shaped models of unperturbed tumor growth. Five different likelihood functions are evaluated and compared using three Bayesian criteria (the Bayesian Information Criterion, Deviance Information Criterion, and Bayes Factor) along with hypothesis tests on residuals. These functions are applied to fit data from unperturbed Ehrlich, fibrosarcoma Sa-37, and F3II tumors using the Gompertz equation, though they are generalizable to other S-shaped growth models for solid tumors or analogous systems (e.g., microorganisms, viruses). Results indicate that error models with tumor volume-dependent dispersion outperform standard constant-variance models in capturing the variability of tumor measurements, particularly the Thres model, which provides interpretable parameters for tumor growth. Additionally, constant-variance models, such as those assuming a normal error distribution, remain valuable as complementary benchmarks in analysis. It is concluded that models incorporating volume-dependent dispersion are preferred for accurate and clinically meaningful tumor growth modeling, whereas constant-dispersion models serve as useful complements for consistency and historical comparability.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasmsAnimalsBayes TheoremHumansLikelihood FunctionsMiceTumor BurdenBayesian parameter estimationGompertzMaximum likelihood estimationMeasurement errorTumor growth

Identifiers

PMID39994407
PMCPMC11850645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.