Observational studyScientific reports2025
Natural language processing of electronic medical records identifies cardioprotective agents for anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in cardio-oncology: decoding mechanisms, predicting toxicity, and personalizing cancer therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Elucidating Celecoxib's Preventive Effect in Capecitabine-Induced Hand-Foot Syndrome Using Medical Natural Language Processing.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this retrospective observational study, we aimed to investigate the potential of natural language processing (NLP) for drug repositioning by analyzing the preventive effects of cardioprotective drugs against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) using electronic medical records. We evaluated the effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers/angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ARB/ACEIs), beta-blockers (BBs), statins, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on AIC using signals extracted from clinical texts via NLP. The study included 2935 patients prescribed anthracyclines at a single hospital, with concomitant prescriptions of ARB/ACEIs, BBs, statins, and CCBs. Upon propensity score matching, groups with and without these medications were compared, and expressions suggestive of cardiotoxicity, extracted via NLP, were considered as the outcome. The hazard ratios for ARB/ACEIs, BBs, statins, and CCBs were 0.58 [95% CI: 0.38-0.88], 0.71 [95% CI: 0.35-1.44], 0.60 [95% CI 0.38-0.95], and 0.63 [95% CI: 0.45-0.88], respectively. ARB/ACEIs, statins, and CCBs significantly suppressed AIC, whereas BBs did not demonstrate statistical significance, possibly due to limited statistical power. NLP-extracted signals from clinical texts reflected the known effects of these medications, demonstrating the feasibility of NLP-based drug repositioning. Further investigation is needed to determine if similar results can be replicated using electronic medical records from other institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.