Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994351›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Diagnostic value of the pregnancy index for acute appendicitis in pregnant women.

Ismail Sezİklİ, Ramazan Topcu, Mehmet Berksun Tutan, Orhan Aslan, Mahmut Arif Yüksek

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Can clinical scoring systems overcome the limitations of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis in pregnancy?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ismail SezİklİFaculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Hitit University, Çorum, 19030, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-1465
Ramazan TopcuFaculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Hitit University, Çorum, 19030, Turkey. topcur58@gmail.com.
Mehmet Berksun TutanFaculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Hitit University, Çorum, 19030, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1834-7355
Orhan AslanFaculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Hitit University, Çorum, 19030, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-0792
Mahmut Arif YüksekFaculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Hitit University, Çorum, 19030, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8323-7390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common non-gynecological and non-obstetric causes of acute abdominal conditions requiring urgent surgery during pregnancy. Due to the similarity between the symptoms of the disease and those of pregnancy, laboratory findings become particularly important in diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate these parameters for the first time using a new index definition. Between 2015 and 2021, a total of 120 patients were included in the study, divided into the four groups: healthy pregnant woman (HPW), healthy woman (HW), unhealthy pregnant woman (UPW, pregnant patient with acute appendicitis), and unhealthy woman (UW, non-pregnant patient with acute appendicitis). Laboratory parameters, including white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), ischemia-modified albumin (iMA), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), were assessed. In this study, significant differences were observed in various laboratory parameters between groups, such as WBC, CRP, NLR, and PLR, indicating potential markers for differentiating between pregnant women with and without appendicitis. An index was created for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women and was named the Pregnant Index. The Pregnant Index (PGIndex) values of pregnant women without appendicitis were compared with those of pregnant women with appendicitis. It was found that the PGIndex value was significantly higher in pregnant women with appendicitis (p < 0.001). Using the ROC curve and Youden index, the PGIndex cut-off value to best differentiate between the two groups was 10.62. This value provided a sensitivity of 73.3%, specificity of 96.7%, positive predictive value of 95.7%, negative predictive value of 78.7%, and test accuracy of 85% for identifying pregnant women with appendicitis. Compared to other markers, the PGIndex had the highest accuracy value, and it was observed that patients with a PGIndex value above 10.62 had a significantly increased likelihood of having appendicitis. These results indicate that the PGIndex is a significant marker for detecting appendicitis in pregnant women. Laboratory parameters, particularly NLR and PLR, show promise as diagnostic tools for appendicitis in pregnant women. Incorporating these markers, the Pregnant Index (PGIndex) demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between pregnant women with and without appendicitis. This is the first study using the Pregnant Index in pregnant women to diagnose appendicitis. Early diagnosis is crucial for preventing maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality associated with appendicitis during pregnancy.

Indexed as

AppendicitisPregnancy ComplicationsAcute DiseaseAdultBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountLymphocytesNeutrophilsPregnancyROC CurveYoung AdultBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinAppendicitisDiagnosisPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39994351
PMCPMC11850719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.