ArticleScientific reports2025
The association of chronic pain, painkiller use, and potential mediators with liver fat content.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive accumulation of liver fat content (LFC) is a pathological manifestation of steatotic liver diseases. This study aims to investigate the relationship between chronic pain and LFC development. In the UK Biobank, chronic pain sites were collected via questionnaire, while LFC was measured by magnetic resonance imaging and quantified by Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF). During the median follow-up of 10.5 (4.0-17.8) years, in 39,437 individuals, neck/shoulder, back, stomach/abdominal, knee, and general pain achieved significant arithmetic means difference of 0.02, 0.02, 0.04, 0.02, and 0.15 in PDFF (P < 0.05) using multivariable linear regression models. There was a significant dose-effect for number of pain sites and PDFF (P < 0.001). Additionally, the link between pain sites and PDFF was much stronger in aspirin users than non-users, while steroids had the reverse effect (P for interaction < 0.05). C-reactive protein, sleep, diet, and depression were proved to mediated 8.41%, 13.3%, 6.6%, and 23.0% of the relationship, respectively. In conclusion, there were quantified differences in the relationship between chronic pain and LFC. For chronic pain patients with potential liver health issues, aspirin may be prioritized as an analgesic option due to its potential protective benefits, whereas steroid medications should be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.