Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994339›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cognitive performance classification of older patients using machine learning and electronic medical records.

Monika Richter-Laskowska, Ewelina Sobotnicka, Adam Bednorz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Linguistic features from paragraph recall are markers of cognitive impairment.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Monika Richter-Laskowska *Łukasiewicz Research Network-Krakow Institute of Technology, Zakopianska Str. 73, 30-418, Krakow, Poland. monika.richter-laskowska@kit.lukasiewicz.gov.pl.
Ewelina SobotnickaŁukasiewicz Research Network-Krakow Institute of Technology, Zakopianska Str. 73, 30-418, Krakow, Poland.
Adam Bednorz *John Paul II Geriatric Hospital, 40-353, Katowice, Poland. adam.bednorz@humanitas.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia rates are projected to increase significantly by 2050, posing considerable challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. Developing efficient diagnostic tools is critical, and machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown potential for improving the accuracy of cognitive impairment classification. This study aims to address challenges in current systems by leveraging readily available electronic medical record (EMR) data to simplify and enhance the classification of cognitive impairment. The analysis includes 283 older adults, categorized into three groups: 144 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 38 with dementia, and 101 healthy controls. Various ML techniques are evaluated to classify cognitive performance levels based on input features such as sociodemographic variables, lab results, comorbidities, Body Mass Index (BMI), and functional scales. Key predictors for distinguishing healthy controls from individuals with MCI are identified. These are history of myocardial infarction, vitamin D3 levels, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, age, and sodium levels. The nonlinear Support Vector Machine (SVM) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel achieve the best performance for MCI classification, with an accuracy of 69%, an AUC of 0.75, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.43. For distinguishing healthy controls from those with dementia, the most influential factors include the IADL scale, the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale, education, vitamin D3 levels, and age. Here, the Random Forest algorithm demonstrates superior performance, achieving 84% accuracy, an AUC of 0.96, and an MCC of 0.71. These two models consistently outperform other ML techniques, such as K-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-Layer Perceptron, linear SVM, Naive Bayes, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis, AdaBoost, and Gaussian Process Classifiers. The findings suggest that EMR data can be an effective resource for the initial classification of cognitive impairments. Integrating these ML-driven approaches into primary care settings may facilitate the early identification of older patients who could benefit from further cognitive assessments.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionDementiaElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSupport Vector MachineDementiaElectronic medical recordsMachine learningMCI

Identifiers

PMID39994339
PMCPMC11850844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.