ArticleScientific reports2025
Cognitive performance classification of older patients using machine learning and electronic medical records.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linguistic features from paragraph recall are markers of cognitive impairment.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026Article
- Article
- Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias From Spontaneous Speech Using Foundation Speech and Language Models: Comparative Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Review of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Use in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Seminars in neurology · 2026Review
- An interpretable multimodal ensemble assessment framework for Alzheimer's disease cognitive staging.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- MMSE-Based Dementia Prediction: Deep vs. Traditional Models.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neurotechnological Approaches to Cognitive Rehabilitation in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review of Neuromodulation, EEG, Virtual Reality, and Emerging AI Applications.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Cognitive function changes and DTI-ALPS index in postmenopausal women.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- BOBM: an adaptive deep learning framework for extended-window sepsis prediction with cross-institutional generalizability.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- AI-assisted screening for mild cognitive impairment using routine EHR data: a Gradient Boosting approach.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia rates are projected to increase significantly by 2050, posing considerable challenges for healthcare systems worldwide. Developing efficient diagnostic tools is critical, and machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown potential for improving the accuracy of cognitive impairment classification. This study aims to address challenges in current systems by leveraging readily available electronic medical record (EMR) data to simplify and enhance the classification of cognitive impairment. The analysis includes 283 older adults, categorized into three groups: 144 individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 38 with dementia, and 101 healthy controls. Various ML techniques are evaluated to classify cognitive performance levels based on input features such as sociodemographic variables, lab results, comorbidities, Body Mass Index (BMI), and functional scales. Key predictors for distinguishing healthy controls from individuals with MCI are identified. These are history of myocardial infarction, vitamin D3 levels, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, age, and sodium levels. The nonlinear Support Vector Machine (SVM) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel achieve the best performance for MCI classification, with an accuracy of 69%, an AUC of 0.75, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.43. For distinguishing healthy controls from those with dementia, the most influential factors include the IADL scale, the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale, education, vitamin D3 levels, and age. Here, the Random Forest algorithm demonstrates superior performance, achieving 84% accuracy, an AUC of 0.96, and an MCC of 0.71. These two models consistently outperform other ML techniques, such as K-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-Layer Perceptron, linear SVM, Naive Bayes, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Linear Discriminant Analysis, AdaBoost, and Gaussian Process Classifiers. The findings suggest that EMR data can be an effective resource for the initial classification of cognitive impairments. Integrating these ML-driven approaches into primary care settings may facilitate the early identification of older patients who could benefit from further cognitive assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.