Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994327›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Men's knowledge of obstetrics danger sign and associated factors in low-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tadele Emagneneh, Chalie Mulugeta, Betelhem Ejigu, Abebaw Alamrew, Esuyawkal Mislu, Wagaw Abebe, Sefineh Fenta Feleke

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tadele EmagnenehDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia. tadeleemagneneh@gmail.com.
Chalie MulugetaDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Betelhem EjiguDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Abebaw AlamrewDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Esuyawkal MisluDepartment of Midwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Wagaw AbebeDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Sefineh Fenta FelekeDepartment of Public Health, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstetric danger signs refer to unexpected signs that arise during pregnancy, childbirth, or the postpartum period, indicating potential complications that require immediate medical attention. Globally, approximately 15% of pregnant women experience such complications, contributing to an estimated 287,000 maternal deaths annually-equivalent to nearly 800 deaths each day. This review evaluates the literature on men's knowledge of obstetric danger signs, a critical factor in enhancing maternal health outcomes. We performed a comprehensive search for articles using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Hinari, and Google Scholar databases. To identify relevant studies, we employed search terms such as "knowledge," "awareness," "information," "recognition," "pregnancy danger signs," "obstetric danger signs," "obstetric warning signs," and "labor complications," combined with "low-income countries." six reviewers independently screened the articles and extracted data. The included articles in the review are cross-sectional studies, conducted in low-income countries and published in English, with no restrictions of publication years. Study quality was evaluated using a Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was reported following the PRISMA checklist and the protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (protocol ID: CRD42024488979). Of the 366 articles initially screened by title and abstract, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. All the included studies assessed men's knowledge of obstetric danger signs during pregnancy, and childbirth, while only ten assessed their knowledge during the postpartum period. The pooled random-effects meta-analysis indicated that men's knowledge of obstetric danger signs was 36.96% during pregnancy, 40.86% during childbirth, and 35.84% during the postpartum period, with an overall knowledge level of 37.29% based on the summarized random-effects meta-analysis. Key factors influencing men's knowledge included urban residence, educational attainment, access to antenatal care, participation in the health development army, and previous experience with obstetric complications. In low-income countries, men's knowledge of obstetric danger signs remains notably low, potentially hindering their ability to seek timely obstetric care for their partners during complications. Addressing this gap requires strengthening counseling services during antenatal care, expanding community meetings, and enhancing community-based health education on obstetric danger signs.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMalePregnancyLow-income countriesMen’s knowledgeObstetric danger signs

Identifiers

PMID39994327
PMCPMC11850788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.