Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994320›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Validation of a machine learning model for indirect screening of suicidal ideation in the general population.

Polona Rus Prelog, Teodora Matić, Peter Pregelj, Aleksander Sadikov

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Indirect, machine learning-based suicide risk screening: Evidence from cross-National Validation.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Polona Rus PrelogCentre for Clinical Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. polona.rus@psih-klinika.si.
Teodora MatićArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Peter PregeljCentre for Clinical Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aleksander SadikovArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (ARIS) Grant Reference Number P2-0209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is among the leading causes of death worldwide and a concerning public health problem, accounting for over 700,000 registered deaths worldwide. However, suicide deaths are preventable with timely and evidence-based interventions, which are often low-cost. Suicidal tendencies range from passive thoughts to ideation and actions, with ideation strongly predicting suicide. However, current screening methods yield limited accuracy, impeding effective prevention. The primary goal of this study was to validate a machine-learning-based model for screening suicidality using indirect questions, developed on data collected during the early COVID-19 pandemic and to differentiate suicide risk among subgroups like age and gender. The detection of suicidal ideation (SI) was based on habits, demographic features, strategies for coping with stress, and satisfaction with three important aspects of life. The model performed on par with the earlier study, surprisingly generalizing well even with different characteristics of the underlying population, not showing any significant effect of the machine learning drift. The sample of 1199 respondents reported an 18.6% prevalence of SI in the past month. The presented model for indirect suicidality screening has proven its validity in different circumstances and timeframes, emphasizing its potential as a tool for suicide prevention and intervention in the general population.

Indexed as

COVID-19Machine LearningMass ScreeningSuicidal IdeationAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSuicideSuicide PreventionSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39994320
PMCPMC11850873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.