ArticleScientific reports2025
Cyclical hybrid imputation technique for missing values in data sets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global-scale patterns of bioavailable soil phosphorus driven by agricultural fertilization.iScience · 2026Article
- Dosing practices of caffeine therapy for apnoea of prematurity: a retrospective single-centre observational study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The problem of missing data in data sets is the most important first step to be addressed in the preprocessing phase. Because incorrect imputation of missing data increases the error in the modeling phase and reduces the prediction performance of the model. When it comes to health, it is inevitable to choose models that show a higher success rate. In cases where there is missing data, the performance of machine learning models may differ depending on the amount of data contained in the data set. The presence of missing data and this high rate affects the accuracy and reliability of analysis and modeling studies because it will affect the complete amount of data in the data set. Estimating and filling in the missing data very precisely, close to its real value, will provide a significant visible performance increase in the modeling phase, which is the next stage. After imputing the missing data with an artificial intelligence model rather than a random method, it is obvious that the accuracy of the model trained with this data is higher than the model trained with data filled with classical filling methods such as mean and mode. In this study, we propose a new algorithm that has been tested on many datasets to address the problems caused by missing data imputation in the dataset. The algorithm aims to impute missing values more effectively by using row-based and column-based imputation techniques together and cyclically. The algorithm takes into account individual missing values using column-based imputation features and the overall data structure using row-based imputation features. The proposed algorithm achieved 100% accuracy with some row and column-based imputation techniques on 3 different datasets used in the study. Higher accuracy was achieved compared to other imputation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.