ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on digital infrastructure construction empowering new quality productivity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact mechanisms and spatial effects of new quality productive forces on healthcare resource allocation in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unleashing new quality productivity for rural revitalization: a spatial panel data analysis of 282 cities in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A dynamic QCA of new quality productivity driving high quality economic development in the yellow river basin.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The impact of industrial agglomeration on new quality productive forces enhancement in China's pig farming industry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Do new quality productivity forces contribute to wellness tourism resilience? Empirical evidence from China.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Attitudes of mHealth end-users toward integrating mobile technology in HIV program monitoring in Cameroon.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Against the backdrop of enhancing digital infrastructure to accelerate the development of new quality productivity, this study uses data from 276 prefecture-level cities in China between 2011 and 2020 to construct a static panel model and empirically examine the impact of digital infrastructure on new quality productivity. The baseline regression results indicate that digital infrastructure significantly promotes new quality productivity and remains robust after a series of stability and endogeneity tests. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that the strength of the positive effect varies across cities of different sizes, administrative levels, and geographical regions. Further mechanism tests show that digital infrastructure catalyzes new quality productivity by fostering technological innovation, improving factor allocation efficiency, and upgrading industrial structures. In addition, spatial spillover analyses suggest that digital infrastructure exerts a positive spillover effect on new quality productivity in adjacent regions, thereby benefiting regional development. These findings provide theoretical foundations and empirical insights for addressing key bottlenecks in leveraging digital infrastructure to drive the expansion of new quality productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.