The impact of an amino acid-humus preparation on lawn boning value.

Adam Radkowski, Iwona Radkowska, Karen Khachatryan, Michał Kozdęba, Henryk Bujak, Karol Wolski

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam RadkowskiDepartment of Agroecology and Plant Production, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Mickiewicza 21, 31-120, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3146-6212

Iwona RadkowskaDepartment of Cattle Breeding, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 32-083, Balice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-1585

Karen KhachatryanLaboratory of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 122, 30-149, Krakow, Poland. karen.khachatryan@urk.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7823-5406

Michał KozdębaDepartment of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Ul. Balicka 116 B, 30-149, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3167-2606

Henryk BujakDepartment of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki 24A, 53-363, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8095-2105

Karol WolskiDepartment of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki 24A, 50-363, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9324-4968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of biostimulants in fertilisation has been shown to enhance plant metabolism, stimulate physiological processes, and mitigate adverse environmental and pathogenic stresses. This study, conducted at the Agricultural University of Krakow (2021-2023), evaluated the efficacy of a foliar amino acid preparation enriched with humic acids (L-Amino + ® Humus) on turf quality. Four experimental variants were established: an untreated control (Variant I) and three treated plots sprayed with the biostimulant at 1.0 (Variant II), 2.0 (Variant III), and 3.0 L ha

Indexed as

Amino AcidsHumic SubstancesPoaceaeFertilizersPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesAmino AcidsFertilizersHumic SubstancesAmino acidsHumic acidsLawnVegetation indices

Identifiers

PMID39994289

DOI10.1038/s41598-025-90862-y

PMCPMC11850864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.