ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced antimicrobial efficacy and biocompatibility of albumin nanoparticles loaded with Mentha extract against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the antiviral effect of casein nanoparticles (CNP) loaded with Plantago major extract (PME-CNP) on herpes simplex virus.Virology journal · 2026Article
- A novel antibacterial approach: targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with carvone nanoemulgel.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Anticancer efficacy of albumin nanoparticles co-loaded with silver nanoparticles and 5FU in animal model of colon cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effect of nanohydrogel-containingJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an effort to combat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), this study investigates the potential of mentha-loaded albumin nanoparticles (MLAN) as a novel antimicrobial agent. MLAN was synthesized by a desolvation method in which the mentha extract was encapsulated in albumin nanoparticles to increase stability and reduce toxicity. Characterization of the nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) confirmed their spherical morphology, a size range of 100-200 nm and uniform distribution. The encapsulation efficiency (EE%) and loading capacity (LC%) of MLAN were determined to be 80% and 72.73%, respectively, indicating a high effectiveness of the encapsulation process. Evaluation of cytotoxicity using the MTT assay revealed that MLAN exhibited significantly higher biocompatibility compared to aqueous Mentha extract and maintained cell viability at 85.1 ± 3.5% at the highest concentration tested (250 µg/mL). Antimicrobial evaluations against MRSA showed that MLAN had larger zones of inhibition and lower minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) values (0.39 mg/mL and 0.78 mg/mL, respectively) compared to the aqueous extract (MIC: 0.78 mg/mL, MBC: 1.56 mg/mL). In addition, real-time PCR showed that MLAN significantly downregulated the expression of key virulence genes (icaA, icaD and ebps) in MRSA, indicating a potential reduction in bacterial virulence. These results suggest that MLAN could be a promising alternative to conventional antibiotics with improved antimicrobial efficacy and reduced cytotoxicity. The study underlines the potential of combining plant extracts with nanotechnology for the development of new therapeutic approaches against antibiotic-resistant pathogens such as MRSA. Further in vivo studies are warranted to validate the clinical applicability of MLAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.