Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effect of individual visual sensitivity on time perception.

Alexandra Ružičková, Lenka Jurkovičová, Julie Páleník, Keith A Hutchison, Jiří Chmelík, Kristína Mitterová, Vojtěch Juřík

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra RužičkováDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. alexandra.ruzickova@mail.muni.cz.
Lenka JurkovičováCentre for Neuroscience, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Julie PáleníkDepartment of Neurology, St. Anne's University Hospital and Medical Faculty of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Keith A HutchisonDepartment of Psychology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Jiří ChmelíkDepartment of Visual Computing, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kristína MitterováCentre for Neuroscience, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vojtěch JuříkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human mind, trying to perceive events coherently, creates the illusion of continuous time passage. Empirical evidence suggests distortions in subjectively perceived time flow associated with well-studied neural responses to sensory stimuli. This study aimed to investigate whether visually uncomfortable patterns, causing exceptionally strong brain activation, affect short time estimates and whether these estimates vary based on the overall reported sensory sensitivity and cortical excitability of individuals. Two experiments in virtual reality testing our assumptions at different levels of complexity of timed stimuli provided initial insight into the studied processes in highly controlled and realistic conditions. Data analysis results did not support our hypotheses, but showed that subjectively most visually uncomfortable simple patterns, i.e., achromatic gratings, cause more variable temporal judgments. Supposedly, this inaccuracy depends on the currently perceived visual comfort and thus the current visual system sensitivity, which cannot be satisfactorily derived from trait-based measures. The exploration of the effect of complex stimuli, i.e., virtual exteriors, suggested that their visual comfort does not affect time perception at all. Biological sex was an important variable across experiments, as males experienced temporal compression of stimuli compared to females. Neuroimaging research is needed for a deeper investigation of the origin of these results.Protocol registration: The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this Registered Report was in-principle accepted on 4 March 2024 prior to data collection for hypothesis testing. The accepted version of the manuscript can be found in the publicly available OSF repository at https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/K3YZE .

Indexed as

Time PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVirtual RealityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39994279
PMCPMC11850724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.