Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An accurate and fast learning approach in the biologically spiking neural network.

Soheila Nazari, Masoud Amiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soheila NazariFaculty of Electrical Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. soheilanazari21@yahoo.com.
Masoud AmiriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. masd.amiri@yahoo.cm.

Funding

Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) 4030166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computations adapted from the interactions of neurons in the nervous system have the potential to be a strong foundation for building computers with cognitive functions including decision-making, generalization, and real-time learning. In this context, a proposed intelligent machine is built on nervous system mechanisms. As a result, the output and middle layer of the machine is made up of a population of pyramidal neurons and interneurons, AMPA/GABA receptors, and excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters. The input layer of the machine is derived from the retinal model. A machine with a structure appropriate to biological evidence needs to learn based on biological evidence. Similar to this, the PSAC (Power-STDP Actor-Critic) learning algorithm was developed as a new learning mechanism based on unsupervised and reinforcement learning procedure. Four datasets MNIST, EMNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 were used to confirm the performance of the proposed learning algorithm compared to deep and spiking networks, and respectively accuracies of 97.7%, 97.95% (digits) and 93.73% (letters), 93.6%, and 75% have been obtained, which shows an improvement in accuracy compared to previous spiking networks. The suggested learning strategy not only outperforms the earlier spike-based learning techniques in terms of accuracy but also exhibits a faster rate of convergence throughout the training phase.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsLearningMachine LearningModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAlgorithmsHumansPyramidal CellsAnd spiking neural networksExcitation and inhibition of neurons and synapsesPower STDPPSACUnsupervised and reinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID39994277
PMCPMC11850897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.