ArticleScientific reports2025
An accurate and fast learning approach in the biologically spiking neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Synchronization-Driven Learning Rule for Pattern Separation in Self-Organizing Probabilistic Spiking Neural Networks.Research square · 2026Article
- Towards the neuromorphic Cyber-Twin: an architecture for cognitive defense in digital twin ecosystems.Frontiers in big data · 2025Review
- NeuroMorphFusion: A Neuro-Inspired Hybrid Learning Framework for Interpretable Deep Lesion Detection in IoT-Enabled Healthcare Systems.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computations adapted from the interactions of neurons in the nervous system have the potential to be a strong foundation for building computers with cognitive functions including decision-making, generalization, and real-time learning. In this context, a proposed intelligent machine is built on nervous system mechanisms. As a result, the output and middle layer of the machine is made up of a population of pyramidal neurons and interneurons, AMPA/GABA receptors, and excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters. The input layer of the machine is derived from the retinal model. A machine with a structure appropriate to biological evidence needs to learn based on biological evidence. Similar to this, the PSAC (Power-STDP Actor-Critic) learning algorithm was developed as a new learning mechanism based on unsupervised and reinforcement learning procedure. Four datasets MNIST, EMNIST, CIFAR10, and CIFAR100 were used to confirm the performance of the proposed learning algorithm compared to deep and spiking networks, and respectively accuracies of 97.7%, 97.95% (digits) and 93.73% (letters), 93.6%, and 75% have been obtained, which shows an improvement in accuracy compared to previous spiking networks. The suggested learning strategy not only outperforms the earlier spike-based learning techniques in terms of accuracy but also exhibits a faster rate of convergence throughout the training phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.